Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 2;8(8):e70252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070252

Table 5. Comparison of outcomes (standardised mean difference) across studies and vote count.

Outcome Study Measure Session content Technique N sess SMD Pr-Po SMD E vs C E G S Bias risk
Social and interpersonal outcomes
Interpersonal contact- patient rated Ulrich et al 2007 GT Patient Active Improvisation, pre-composed 7.5 0.41 0.64* + + + L
Interpersonal contact- nurse rated Ulrich et al 2007 GT Nurse Active Improvisation, pre-composed 7.5 0.18 0.25 + + L
Social Functioning Silverman 2009a RD Scale Receptive Lyric analysis 1 na 0.09 + + L
Interaction Morgan et al 2011 NOSIE Interaction Active Improvisation, songwriting 4 0.5 −2.30 + - L
Working alliance- therapist Silverman 2011b HAQ-II Therapist Active Songwriting 1 na 1.09* + + + M
Working alliance- patient Silverman 2011b HAQ-II Patient Active Songwriting 1 na 0.31 + + M
Dichotomous Social and interpersonal
Group cohesion Cassity 1976 SQ Active Didactic 10 1.12 0.98 + + M
Peer Acceptance Cassity 1976 SQ Active Didactic 10 0.76 0.61 + + M
Interpersonal relations Cassity 1976 SQ Active Didactic 10 nr nr M
Global functioning
Talwar et al 2006 GAF Active Improvisation, verbal reflection 12 0.43 0.13 + + L
Moe et al 2000 GAF Receptive Modified GIM 28 1.22* na + + M
Increased quality of life
Ulrich et al 2007 SPG Active Improvisation, pre-composed 7.5 0.24 0.05 + + L
Global distress
Odell-Miller 2006 CORE Active Improvisation nr 0.09 0.02 - - M
General psychiatric symptoms
Morgan et al 2011 BPRS Total Active Improvisation, songwriting 4 −1.07 −0.16* + + + L
Talwar et al 2006 PANSS General Active Improvisation, verbal reflection 12 −0.71 −0.32 + + L
Negative symptoms
Morgan et al 2011 BPRS -ve symptoms Active Improvisation, songwriting 4 −1.43 −0.03* + + + L
Ulrich et al 2007 SANS Total Active Improvisation, pre-composed 7.5 −0.53 −0.42* + + + L
Talwar et al 2006 PANSS -ve symptoms Active Improvisation, verbal reflection 12 −0.56 −0.30 + + L
Positive symptoms
Morgan et al 2011 BPRS+ve symptoms Active Improvisation, songwriting 4 −1.08 −0.24* + + + L
Morgan et al 2011 NOSIE Psychosis Active Improvisation, songwriting 4 −0.67 −0.10 + + L
Talwar et al 2006 PANSS+ve symptoms Active Improvisation, verbal reflection 12 −0.67 −0.28 + + L
Positive and negative symptoms
Talwar et al 2006 PANSS Total Active Improvisation, verbal reflection 12 −0.66 −0.26* + + + L
Depression
Morgan et al 2011 BPRS Depression Active Improvisation, songwriting 4 −1.06 −0.05* + + + L
Morgan et al 2011 Calgary Active Improvisation, songwriting 4 −0.63 −0.04 + + L
Morgan et al 2011 DASS-21 Active Improvisation, songwriting 4 −0.51 0.02 + L
Anxiety and depression
Odell-Miller 2006 HADS Active Improvisation nr −0.12 0.15 + M
Dissociation
Morgan et al 2011 BPRS Dissociation Active Improvisation, songwriting 4 −0.73 −0.12* + + + L
Mania
Morgan et al 2011 BPRS Mania Active Improvisation, songwriting 4 −1.2 −0.13* + + + L
Anxiety
Morgan et al 2011 DASS-21 Active Improvisation, songwriting 4 −0.83 −0.10 + + L
Stress
Morgan et al 2011 DASS-21 Active Improvisation, songwriting 4 −0.71 −0.22 + + L
Irritability
Morgan et al 2011 NOSIE Irritability Active Improvisation, songwriting 4 −0.5 0.13 + L
Ward behaviour
Morgan et al 2011 NOSIE Total Active Improvisation, songwriting 4 0.46 −0.08 + + L
Life skills
Odell-Miller 2006 LSP Active Improvisation nr −0.3 −0.63 M
Psychoeducational knowledge
Silverman 2009a KIRI Receptive Lyric analysis 1 na 0.08 + L
Coping skills
Silverman 2011a Study 1: PCI Mixed Songwriting, lyric analysis, music games 3 na 1.52 + M
Silverman 2011a Study 2: PCI Mixed Songwriting, lyric analysis, music games 1 na 0.12 + M
Silverman 2011b COPE Active Songwriting 1 na 0.03 + M
Appraisal and satisfaction
Increased satisfaction with services Talwar et al 2006 CSQ Active Improvisation, verbal reflection 12 0.34 0.33 + + L
Increased enjoyment Silverman 2011b RD Scale Active Songwriting 1 na 0.09 + M
Increased enjoyment Silverman 2009a RD Scale Receptive Lyric analysis 1 na 0.15 + L
Increased helpfulness Silverman 2009a RD Scale Receptive Lyric analysis 1 na 0.09 + L
Increased satisfaction with life Silverman 2009a SWLS Receptive Lyric analysis 1 na 0.24 + L
Increased comfort Silverman 2009a RD Scale Receptive Lyric analysis 1 na −0.08 L
Vote count coding key

+Direction of experimental pre-post SMD indicates improvement/group difference SMD favours intervention/significantly favours intervention.

− Direction of experimental pre-post SMD indicates deterioration/group difference SMD favours control/significantly favours control.

*

Statistically significant (p<.05).

N sess- Number of sessions received, SMD- Standardised mean difference, Count- Vote count, nr- not reported, na- not applicable.

BPRS- Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Calgary- Calgary Interview Guide for Depression, COPE- Brief COPE Inventory, CORE- Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation, CSQ- Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, DASS-21- Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale, GAF- Global Assessment of Functioning Scale, HADS- Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HAQ-II- Helping Alliance Questionnaire, KIRI- Knowledge of Illness and Resources Inventory, LSP- Life Skills Profile, NOSIE- Nurses' Observation Scale for Inpatient Evaluation, PANSS- Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale, PCI- Proactive Coping Inventory, RD- Researcher designed, SANS- Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, SMD- Standardised mean difference, SPG- Scales for Mental Health, SQ- Social Questionnaire, SWLS- Satisfaction with Life Scale.