Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 2;8(8):e72663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072663

Table 2. Correlation between parameters of thrombin generation and microvesicle levels in each subject group.

Group TG parameter Mean values EMV (CD144+ve) PMV (CD42b+ve)
HD PT (nM) 57.1±25.1 r=0.52; p=0.02 r=0.7; p=0.002
ETP (nM) 928±398 r=0.53; p=0.02 r=0.72; p=0.001
Lag time (mins) 10.9±1.8 r=-0.55; p=0.02 r=-0.44; p=0.08
PD PT (nM) 76.7±38.5 r=0.62; p=0.02 r=0.56; p=0.03
ETP (nM) 1121±421 r=0.54; p=0.04 r=0.63; p=0.01
Lag time (mins) 10.8±2.5 r=-0.38; p=0.18 r=-0.63; p=0.01
HC PT (nM) 34.8±18.1 r=0.5; p=0.05 r=0.51; p=0.04
ETP (nM) 637±314 r=0.49; p=0.05 r=0.51; p=0.04
Lag time (mins) 9.3±1.6 r=-0.23; P=0.4 r=-0.02; p=0.94

PT, peak thrombin measurement; ETP, endogenous thrombin potential; EMV, endothelial derived microvesicles; PMV, platelet derived microvesicles; HD, haemodialysis; PD, peritoneal dialysis; HC, healthy controls. Data are shown, as mean±SD. Correlations were calculated using Pearson’s test.