Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 6.
Published in final edited form as: N Engl J Med. 2013 May 20;368(23):2201–2209. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1302854

Table 3.

Secondary Outcomes.*

Outcome Intervention Control Relative Risk with Intervention (95% CI) P Value
no./total no. (%)
ICU mortality
 All patients 154/820 (19) 139/778 (18) 1.07 (0.90–1.28) 0.45
 Patients admitted at night 90/500 (18) 81/470 (17) 1.02 (0.82–1.27) 0.88
Hospital mortality
 All patients 203/820 (25) 177/778 (23) 1.08 (0.93–1.25) 0.33
 Patients admitted at night 122/500 (24) 103/470 (22) 1.06 (0.88–1.28) 0.51
Discharge home from the hospital
 All patients 317/820 (39) 314/778 (40) 0.95 (0.85–1.07) 0.41
 Patients admitted at night 190/500 (38) 197/470 (42) 0.94 (0.82–1.09) 0.44
ICU readmission within 48 hr
 All patients 32/602 (5) 21/630 (3) 1.56 (0.84–2.89) 0.16
 Patients discharged at night 20/324 (6) 14/356 (4) 1.36 (0.53–3.47) 0.52
*

For all secondary outcomes except for readmissions, the exposure to intervention or control staffing was considered to be the exposure to the staffing model that was in place on the day of admission. For readmissions, the exposure to intervention or control was considered to be the exposure to the staffing model that was in place at time of discharge or, for daytime discharges, during the preceding night. Night admissions were considered to be admissions between 5:00 p.m. and 4:59 a.m. The reference for all the analyses is the control group.

A relative risk of more than 1 indicates that a greater proportion of patients in the intervention group had the outcome, whereas a relative risk of less than 1 indicates that a greater proportion of patients in the control group had the outcome.

The analyses of ICU readmissions were restricted to patients who were discharged to floor locations within the hospital.