Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cancer. 2013 Mar 7;133(5):1247–1252. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28100

Table 2.

Male circumcision and HR-HPV viral DNA load in female partners.

Intervention group
Control group
PRR (95% CI)* adjPRR (95% CI)&
High HR-HPV Viral Load* / N^ Percent (%) High HR-HPV Viral Load* / N^ Percent (%)
Overall
    Baseline 207/352 58.8% 210/338 62.1% 0.94 (0.83 - 1.07) 0.94 (0.83 - 1.06)
    Year One 159/315 50.5% 188/353 53.3% 0.95 (0.82 - 1.11) 0.96 (0.82 - 1.12)
    Year Two 99/232 42.7% 167/303 55.1% 0.78 (0.65 - 0.94) 0.80 (0.66 - 0.96)
Persistent HR-HPV
    Year One 83/124 66.9% 85/119 71.4% 0.97 (0.83-1.13) 0.98 (0.84 - 1.14)
    Year Two 50/73 68.5% 80/118 67.8% 1.02 (0.83 - 1.24) 1.04 (0.86 - 1.27)
Incident HR-HPV
    Year One 76/191 39.8% 103/234 44.0% 0.91 (0.71 - 1.16) 0.94 (0.74 - 1.19)
    Year Two 49/159 30.8% 87/185 47.0% 0.66 (0.50 - 0.87) 0.67 (0.50 - 0.89)
*

High HR-HPV viral load includes a linear array band signal strength of 3 or 4 which represents >200 copies/5μl.

^

N is the total number of genotypes detected.

#PRR is a prevalence risk ratio.

&

adjPRR is an adjusted prevalence risk ratio. The multivariate analysis adjusted for age and number of sexual partners.