Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 7;19(29):4808–4817. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i29.4808

Table 5.

Results of meta-analysis

Groups Diagnosis
N staging
Liver metastasis
Prognosis
Sen (95%CI) Spe (95%CI) Sen (95%CI) Spe (95%CI) Pv- (95%CI) Sen (95%CI) Spe (95%CI) HR (95%CI)
Overall 0.91 (0.88-0.93) 0.81 (0.75-0.85) 0.64 (0.50-0.76) 0.81 (0.25-0.85) 0.65 (0.28-0.90) 0.67 (0.52-0.79) 0.96 (0.89-0.98)
P subgroup 0.89 (0.84-0.92) 0.84 (0.76-0.89) 0.56 (0.15-0.90) 0.79 (0.48-0.94) - 0.57 (0.21-0.88) 0.94 (0.68-0.99) 2.39 (1.57-3.63)
R subgroup 0.90 (0.83-0.95) 0.75 (0.58-0.87) 0.61 (0.32-0.85) 0.17 (0.04-0.81) - 0.56 (0.28-0.81) 0.94 (0.65-0.99) 3.40 (2.01-5.74)
NR subgroup 0.93 (0.88-0.96) 0.82 (0.74-0.87) 0.70 (0.46-0.87) 0.97 (0.84-0.99) - 0.74 (0.52-0.88) 0.92 (0.83-0.96) 3.96 (1.92-8.17)
PET subgroup 0.91 (0.88-0.93) 0.80 (0.74-0.85) - - - 0.67 (0.52-0.79) 0.96 (0.89-0.98) 2.06 (1.26-3.36)
PET/CT subgroup 0.90 (0.79-0.95) 0.85 (0.38-0.98) - - - 0.82 (0.48-0.98) 0.97 (0.87-1.00) -

N: Lymph node; P: Prospective; R: Retrospective; NR: Not reporting; Sen: Sensitivity; Spe: Specificity; Pv-: Negative predictive value; PET: Positron emission tomography; CT: Computed tomography.