Table 2. PNM posterior probabilities of previously identified periodically expressed genes.
Method | No. of genes | PNM tested | Pmean | P > 0.95 | Source | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Traditional approach |
104 |
102 |
0.865 |
78 |
76.5% |
Spellman et al. (1) |
Visual inspection |
421 |
409 |
0.808 |
289 |
70.7% |
Cho et al. (2) |
Fourier transformation |
800 |
788 |
0.822 |
540 |
68.5% |
Spellman et al. (1) |
SPM overlap-1 |
1106 |
1041 |
0.698 |
539 |
51.8% |
Zhao et al. (7) |
SPM overlap-2 |
260 |
257 |
0.963 |
229 |
89.1% |
Zhao et al. (7) |
SPM overlap-3 | 78 | 78 | 0.997 | 77 | 98.7% | Zhao et al. (7) |
Pmean: mean posterior probability of each list. Pmean of PNM selected 822 genes is 0.992.
SPM overlap-1, 2, 3 are the lists of the genes which passed the SPM threshold one, two and three times in experiment cdc28, alpha and cdc15 according to the data from the authors’ website.
Overlaps of gene lists of traditional approach (T), Cho et al. (C), Spellman et al. (S) and Zhao et al. (Z) are: T–C 73, T–S 95, T–Z 88, C–S 304, C–Z 304 and S–Z 525.