Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 27.
Published in final edited form as: Transplantation. 2013 Mar 27;95(6):859–865. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31827eef7e

Table 2.

Comparison of vascular geometry and progression of allograft vasculopathy in one year by 3D IVUS in patients with HTx and H+Liver Tx.

Combined heart liver (n=10) Heart alone (n=25) P value
VV/SL (mm3/mm)
Baseline 13.1±3.5 14.9±4.7 0.2#
Follow up 13.1±3.0 15.6±5.9 0.1*
Absolute difference −0.01±3.2 0.64±4.5 0.6#
Change in % −4.4±33.6 −1.4±30.3 0.8#
P-value 0.9 0.5
PV/SL (mm3/mm)
Baseline 4.2±1.9 4.3±1.9 0.8#
Follow up 4.5±2.0 5.8±2.9 0.1*
Absolute difference 0.3±1.1 1.5±2.9 0.08#
Change in % −1.6±44.0 17.8±37.5 0.2#
P-value 0.4 0.02
PI (%)
Baseline 0.31±0.1 0.28±0.08 0.5#
Follow up 0.32±0.11 0.39±0.14 0.2*
Absolute difference 0.01±0.03 0.1±0.1 0.004#
Change in % 4.7±11.6 40.2±50.6 0.002#
P-value 0.2 0.0006

SL: segment length; VV: vessel volume; LV: lumen volume; PV: plaque volume; PI: plaque index; HTx: Heart transplant; H+Liver Tx: combined heart and liver transplant

*

ANCOVA test; baseline value is a covariate.

#

T-test

Paired t test