Skip to main content
. 2004 Feb 11;32(3):1037–1049. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh253

Table 4. Comparison of the accuracies (% ± 95% confidence intervals) between the NetPhos and DISPHOS.

Site
NetPhos
DISPHOS position-specific
Final DISPHOS
      Round 1a Round 2 Round 3 Round 4
S
69.2
74.9 ± 0.3
75.6 ± 0.3
75.8 ± 0.4
76.0 ± 0.3
76.0 ± 0.3
 
 
 
VL2 disorder
VLXT disorder
Relative frequency G
Relative frequency I
T
71.9
78.9 ± 0.6
80.5 ± 0.3
81.0 ± 0.3
81.1 ± 0.3
81.3 ± 0.3
 
 
 
VL2 disorder
Relative frequency S
NNSSP helix
Relative frequency F
Y
60.6
81.3 ± 0.5
82.0 ± 0.3
83.3 ± 0.3
83.3 ± 0.3
83.0 ± 0.3
      Relative frequency Q Relative frequency T Relative frequency K Surface exposure

aThe achieved accuracy of predictor together with the best feature for each selection round is shown. The accuracies of S, T and Y phosphorylation sites predictors increased by 6.8, 9.4 and 22.7%, respectively, in comparison with NetPhos.