Table 4. Comparison of the accuracies (% ± 95% confidence intervals) between the NetPhos and DISPHOS.
Site |
NetPhos |
DISPHOS position-specific |
Final DISPHOS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Round 1a | Round 2 | Round 3 | Round 4 | |||
S |
69.2 |
74.9 ± 0.3 |
75.6 ± 0.3 |
75.8 ± 0.4 |
76.0 ± 0.3 |
76.0 ± 0.3 |
|
|
|
VL2 disorder |
VLXT disorder |
Relative frequency G |
Relative frequency I |
T |
71.9 |
78.9 ± 0.6 |
80.5 ± 0.3 |
81.0 ± 0.3 |
81.1 ± 0.3 |
81.3 ± 0.3 |
|
|
|
VL2 disorder |
Relative frequency S |
NNSSP helix |
Relative frequency F |
Y |
60.6 |
81.3 ± 0.5 |
82.0 ± 0.3 |
83.3 ± 0.3 |
83.3 ± 0.3 |
83.0 ± 0.3 |
Relative frequency Q | Relative frequency T | Relative frequency K | Surface exposure |
aThe achieved accuracy of predictor together with the best feature for each selection round is shown. The accuracies of S, T and Y phosphorylation sites predictors increased by 6.8, 9.4 and 22.7%, respectively, in comparison with NetPhos.