Table 2.
Excellent |
Very good |
Good |
Reasonable |
Weak |
Very weak |
Non-existent |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Main aspects | Detailed aspects | Description | Score | |||
Relevance |
1. The content of activities correspond with the vision |
Ascertain highest points are awarded if. |
||||
2. Working methods correspond with the vision |
*The activities of the organization actually correspond to its vision and this is the subject of continuous reflection and internal discussion. |
|||||
*The organization practices what it preaches. | ||||||
Lowest points are awarded if. | ||||||
*There is no link between the origination’s activities and its vision, and planning and methods development are not given priority. | ||||||
*There are double standards and self-contradiction in the organization. | ||||||
Right skills in relation to activities |
1. Professional qualifications and experience of the staff |
Ascertain whether the organization has a recruitment strategy and selects personnel in accordance with existing, documented criteria. |
||||
2. Ability of management |
Highest points are awarded to organizations. |
|||||
*That have documented job descriptions for all posts and which, in addition, have staff in place that fully meet the criteria of the job descriptions. | ||||||
*If the staff regard management as legitimate and give management their active support. | ||||||
Lowest points are awarded to organizations. | ||||||
*In which there are no documented requirements of qualifications and experience. | ||||||
*Where management is not legitimate in the eyes of the staff or does not participate in activities. | ||||||
Working environment |
1. Government rules / regulatory environment |
Ascertain what the legal context is in which the organization operates, and what rules or frameworks the government has regarding the organization's area of activities. |
||||
Highest points are awarded if the organization's. | ||||||
*Activities are in line with the government's vision and policy statements of multilateral organizations e.g. WHO. | ||||||
*Plays a leadership role. | ||||||
Lowest points are awarded if the organization's activities fall short of the government policies. |
Please rate the 8 main aspects of your organization’s status of research ethics on the following scale.