Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Radiol. 2013 Aug;20(8):930–938. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.03.011

TABLE 5.

Analysis of Variance between Groups B1 and C, B2 and C

Feature B2 and C P B1 and C P
Mean .639 .733
Entropy .001 .005
Uniformity .003 .011
Standard deviation .044 .149
Smoothness .079 .310
Third moment .362 .025
Norm .240 .120
Contrast .138 .176
Line_likeness .002 .437
T1 .632 .469
T2 .810 .350
T3 .041 .777
T4 .017 .517
T5 .007 .014
T7 .042 .856
T8 .021 .218
T9 .000 .015
T10 .605 .967
T11 .756 .279
f1 .000 .005
f2 .186 .814
f3 .931 .134
f4 .565 .453
f5 .085 .861
f6 .736 .681
f7 .603 .672
f8 .007 .753
f9 .000 .001
f10 .032 .426
f11 .028 .578
f14 .186 .814
f15 .940 .052
f16 .182 .103

significant difference between groups B2 and C; △, no significant difference between groups B2 and C; ●, significant difference between groups B1 and C; ○, no significant difference between groups B1 and C.

The difference between groups was considered to be significant if P < .05. Nine features show significant difference between subgroup B2 and group C and no significant difference between subgroup B1 and group C (indicated by ▲ and ○). Only one feature shows the opposite result (indicated by △ and ●).