Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 6;8(8):e69748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069748

Table 4. Univariate Cox regression analysis of dichotomized and continuous AQUA scores for OS.

Dichotomized AQUA Scores Continuous AQUA Scores*
Marker Hazard Ratio 95% CI P value Hazard Ratio 95% CI P value
B-Raf 0.89 0.66–1.19 0.4175 0.99 0.90–1.09 0.8185
c-Kit 0.77 0.59–1.02 0.0728 0.89 0.801.00 0.0410
C-Raf 0.93 0.70–1.23 0.5961 0.91 0.80–1.03 0.1470
FGF-R1 0.75 0.570.98 0.0381 0.86 0.790.93 0.0004
VEGF-R1 0.75 0.561.00 0.0517 0.88 0.800.97 0.0120
VEGF-R3 1.03 0.78–1.36 0.8274 0.98 0.91–1.06 0.6869
MEK1 0.94 0.71–1.26 0.6883 0.96 0.87–1.05 0.3228
PDGF-Rβ 0.81 0.61–1.07 0.1421 0.92 0.83–1.02 0.1079
STMN1 1.09 0.80–1.48 0.5927 1.01 0.93–1.09 0.8337
MAP2 0.83 0.61–1.13 0.2359 0.95 0.88–1.03 0.1956
EB1 0.83 0.63–1.10 0.2028 0.97 0.90–1.05 0.4323
Bcl-2 1.05 0.80–1.39 0.7192 1.00 0.93–1.08 0.9552
ERK1/2 0.96 0.71–1.28 0.7564 0.95 0.88–1.03 0.2056
VEGF-R2 1.06 0.80–1.39 0.7012 0.95 0.83–1.08 0.4140

*Hazard ratios were calculated per 10-point change in AQUA scores.