Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Stimul. 2013 Mar 21;6(5):777–787. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.03.002

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Comparison of continuous and intermittent rTMS pulses on regional CBF. A. ROI analysis (mean ± SEM) of L-M1 for continuous (450 pulses) and intermittent (225 pulses) delivery of 3 Hz rTMS pulses. B. Linear regression of all the sites listed in Table 1 at 3 Hz rTMS. This supports the notion that we are examining an intrinsic frequency response of the motor system, rather than the cumulative effect of stimuli bombarding the system.