Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Apr 30;39(2):455–462. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24160

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Magnitude and PC reconstructions of an in-vivo data. The 192 view data reconstructed using standard methods is shown in a and c. The under-sampled 16 view data reconstructed with TCR is shown in b and d. Motion artifacts, most likely due to respiration, are evident in the 192 view data and the image quality of the 16 view data is much better.