Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 3.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2013 Mar 21;135(13):4950–4953. doi: 10.1021/ja400970n

Table 1.

Steady-state kinetic data for turnover of compounds by AmpD, AmpDh2 and AmpDh3.a

Enzyme/Compds Km (mM) kcat (s−1) kcat/Km (M−1s−1)
AmpD 4 2.0 ± 0.1 24.2 ± 3.5 12100 ± 1800
5 1.2 ± 0.3 39.8 ± 3.1 33200 ± 7500
6 1.9 ± 0.2 47.5 ± 5.5 25000 ± 4600
7, 8, 9b - - -

AmpDh2 4 1.5 ± 0.2 0.20 ± 0.02 130 ± 17
5 4.6 ± 0.5 20 ± 1.9 4300 ± 790
6 1.9 ± 0.2 0.18 ± 0.02 95 ± 14
7 1.5 ± 0.1 51.8 ± 8.9 34500 ± 4300
8 1.8 ± 0.3 73.6 ± 5.3 40900 ± 6800
9 1.4 ± 0.2 1.6 ± 0.2 1100 ± 150

AmpDh3 4 3.2 ± 0.5 17.9 ± 1.3 5590 ± 610
5 4.5 ± 0.6 70.6 ± 6.6 15700 ± 1900
6 1.4 ± 0.1 20.6 ± 1.9 14700 ± 1600
7 2.2 ± 0.3 195 ± 24 88600 ± 13600
8 1.4 ± 0.2 212 ± 19.3 151000 ± 20500
9 2.4 ± 0.3 85.3 ± 10.2 35500 ± 4800
a

The activities of all three enzymes decreased in the presence of EDTA, indicating that they are zinc proteases. Kinetic measurements were performed in the presence of 100 μM ZnCl2 as a supplement for AmpDh2 and AmpDh3.

b

No measurable activity was detected for AmpD with these compounds.