. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Feb 6;38(4):868–875. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24042

Table 1.

Mean ΔrCBV values on tFDMs and fcFDMs

	iADC	dADC	ncADC
ΔrCBV (tFDM)	1.02 (0.32)	−0.77 (0.36)	0.009 (0.080)	iADC>dADC^*; iADC>ncADC^; dADC<ncADC^*
ΔrCBV (fcFDM)	0.24 (0.18)	−0.28 (0.31)	−0.02 (0.080)	N.S.
	^***	^**	N.S.
% Classification Changing Voxels (tFDM → fcFDM)	52.6 (2.7)	52.9 (3.0)	4.7 (2.8)	iADC>ncADC^*;dADC>ncADC^*
ΔrCBV in Classification Changing voxels (tFDM → fcFDM)	1.26 (0.37) p = 0.0023	−0.97 (0.35) p = 0.010	−0.086 (0.25) p = 0.727	iADC>dADC^*; iADC>ncADC^; dADC<ncADC^*

Values are given in means (standard errors);

p<0.05,

^**

p<0.01,

^***

p<0.001;

N.S. = Not Significant; tFDM = traditional tFDM = traditional functional diffusion map; fcFDM = flow compensated functional diffusion map.