Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Cancer Ther. 2013 Mar 19;12(6):959–967. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-0707

Table 3. Chemosensitisation of antitumour activity determined in mice bearing SW620 xenografts.

Treatment Nadir %
Starting
Body weight
Time to
RTV4
Delay
(days)§
Enhancement
(%)
Vehicle control 96.3 6.5
KU59403 12.5 mg/kg 2× daily ×5 100 7 0.5
Etopohos (equivalent to 10 mg/kg
etoposide) daily ×5
98.6 10.5 4
Etophos + KU59403 6 mg/kg 2× daily
×5
96.9 12 5.5 38
Etophos + KU59403 12.5 mg/kg 2×
daily ×5
94.9 15 8.5 113§
Etophos + KU59403 25 mg/kg 2×
daily ×5
93.3 18 11.5 190*
Etophos + KU59403 12.5 mg/kg 1×
daily ×5 concurrent
96.5 16.5 10 150
Etophos + KU59403 12.5 mg/kg 1×
daily ×5 5 hr post
94.3 10 3.5 0
Irinotecan 2.5 mg/kg daily ×5 93.6 14.5 8
KU59403 25 mg/kg daily ×5 99.7 12 5.5
Irinotecan + KU59403 25 mg/kg
daily ×5
100 26 19.5 144*
§

Delay (days) is the tumour growth delay, which is calculated as the time to median relative tumour volume 4 (median RTV4) following relevant treatment minus time to median RTV4 in control mice

Enhancement (%) is calculated as (100*(delay combination/delay cytotoxic alone))-100

*

indicates statistically significant enhancement (p<0.05)

§

indicates marginally statistically significant enhancement (p<0.1)