Table 2.
method of determining ploidy/CIN | method actually reflects | tumor type | n | type of survival | __ year survival | survival rate for: | ref | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
stable diploid | altered ploidy/ CIN | |||||||
DNA content (aneuploidy and polyploidy) | ||||||||
DNA image cytometry- SSIa | proliferative index + heterogeneity | breast | 154 | overall | 2–3 | 98% | 74% | [75] |
890 | overall | 10 | ~90% | ~65% | [54] | |||
flow cytometry | # and location of all DNA peaks | breast | 1391 | relapse-free | 10 | ~80–95% | ~60–75% | [87] |
not specified | STSb | 102 | metastasis-free | 5 | 77% | 48% | [88] | |
multiple stemlinesc | 46 | overall | 15 | ~55% | ~20% | [89] | ||
nuclear grading | nuclear aread | lunge | 133 | recurrence-free | 5 | 90% | 58% | [90] |
largest nuclear diameterd | 133 | recurrence-free | 5 | 89% | 62% | |||
genomic index | segmental gains & losses by CHG/# chromosomes involved | STSb (GIST)f | 60 | metastasis-free | 5 | 93% | 16% | [78] |
FISH (cellular heterogeneity or CIN) | ||||||||
FISH (centromeres for Chr 3, 10, 11 & 17) | heterogeneity of 4 chromosomes | lunge | 50 | overall | 4 | ~75% | ~35% | [91] |
FISH (EGFR-7p12, MYC-8q24, 5p15, 6cen, p16–9p21 | heterogeneity of ≥ 4 chromosomes | 47 | overall | 5 | 77% | 33% | [92] | |
heterogeneity of ≥ 3 chromosomes | 63 | overall | 5 | 94% | 69% | [53] | ||
abnormal anaphases (lagging chromosomes and chromatin bridges) | ||||||||
lagging/bridge chromosomes | chromosome missegregation | lymphomag | 54 | overall | 10 | ~65 | ~45 | [23] |
gene signatures | ||||||||
CIN70 and CIN25 gene signaturesh | structural aneuploidy and proliferation | 6 typesi | 1944 | overall (breast cohort) | 10 | ~70 | ~55 | [76] |
12 gene genomic instability signaturej | proliferative index/SSIa | breast | 469 | overall | 5 | ~70–90% | ~40–60% | [52] |
metastasis-free | ~60–80% | ~30–50% | ||||||
lunge | 637 | overall | 5 | ~50–60% | ~10–40% | [93] | ||
ovarian | 124 | relapse-free | 10 | ~65% | ~15% | |||
67 gene CINSARC signaturek | combination of structural aneuploidy, proliferation and tumor grade | STSb | 127 | metastasis-free | 5 | 75–84% | 35–48% | [94] |
STSb (GIST)f | 32 | metastasis-free | 5 | 100% | 61% | |||
10 | 100% | 30% | ||||||
breast | 373 | metastasis-free | 10 | ~75–80% | ~35–60% | |||
lymphomag | 278 | overall | 10 | ~65–75% | ~35–40% | |||
Aurora A expression | AURKA mRNA level | STSb (GIST)f | 60 | metastasis-free | 5 | 100% | 38% | [78] |
100% | 12% | |||||||
112 CIN gene signaturel | Loss of heterozygosity | colon | 548 | disease-free | 5 | ~95% | ~75% | [95] |
Stemline Scatter Index (SSI) is the percentage of cells in S phase + the percentage of cells > 5c + coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean). S
phase percentage contributes most to SSI.
Soft tissue sarcoma.
”Tumors were considered aneuploid when a distinct separate second or more G0/G1
peak(s) was present”.
based on H&E staining.
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
To identify the CIN70 and CIN25 gene signatures, the authors inferred aneuploidy based on gene expression data. They then confirmed that in NCI60 cell lines, this correlates with structural aneuploidy as measured by SKY and SNPchip DNA copy number. Tumors with low versus high aneuploidy were compared to identify the 25 or 70 genes with the highest CIN score (designated CIN25 and CIN70). 43/70=61% of CIN70 genes are cell cycle regulated [77].
The CIN25 signature is prognostic in 1 lung, 5 breast, 1 mesothelioma, 3 glioma, 1 medulloblastoma and 1 lymphoma cohort, but not in 3 lung, 1 ovarian, 1 lymphoma and 1 prostate cohort.
The 12 gene signature was identified by analyzing gene expression data from 48 primary breast carcinomas stratified into 17 diploid genomically stable, 15 aneuploid genomically stable, and 16 aneuploid genomically unstable tumors by SSI. Only Aurora A overlaps with the CIN70 genes.
CINSARC (Complexity INdex in SARComa) genes were identified by comparing expression differences between 1) tumors with CGH imbalances of <20 with >35; 2) grade 3 vs grade 2 tumors; 3) CIN70 signature.
The 112 CIN gene signature was identified by determining the LOH status in 745 tumors using 9 microsatellite markers representing 4 chromosome arms. An LOH ratio of 33% was used to separate CIN high from CIN low tumors. 25 CIN high and 10 CIN low tumors were used to identify the 112 gene signature. These 112 genes are non-overlapping with the CIN70.