Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2013 Feb 13;24(4):370–379. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2013.02.001

Table 2.

Prognostic value of aneuploidy, polyploidy and CIN.

method of determining ploidy/CIN method actually reflects tumor type n type of survival __ year survival survival rate for: ref
stable diploid altered ploidy/ CIN
DNA content (aneuploidy and polyploidy)
DNA image cytometry- SSIa proliferative index + heterogeneity breast 154 overall 2–3 98% 74% [75]
890 overall 10 ~90% ~65% [54]
flow cytometry # and location of all DNA peaks breast 1391 relapse-free 10 ~80–95% ~60–75% [87]
not specified STSb 102 metastasis-free 5 77% 48% [88]
multiple stemlinesc 46 overall 15 ~55% ~20% [89]
nuclear grading nuclear aread lunge 133 recurrence-free 5 90% 58% [90]
largest nuclear diameterd 133 recurrence-free 5 89% 62%
genomic index segmental gains & losses by CHG/# chromosomes involved STSb (GIST)f 60 metastasis-free 5 93% 16% [78]
FISH (cellular heterogeneity or CIN)
FISH (centromeres for Chr 3, 10, 11 & 17) heterogeneity of 4 chromosomes lunge 50 overall 4 ~75% ~35% [91]
FISH (EGFR-7p12, MYC-8q24, 5p15, 6cen, p16–9p21 heterogeneity of ≥ 4 chromosomes 47 overall 5 77% 33% [92]
heterogeneity of ≥ 3 chromosomes 63 overall 5 94% 69% [53]
abnormal anaphases (lagging chromosomes and chromatin bridges)
lagging/bridge chromosomes chromosome missegregation lymphomag 54 overall 10 ~65 ~45 [23]
gene signatures
CIN70 and CIN25 gene signaturesh structural aneuploidy and proliferation 6 typesi 1944 overall (breast cohort) 10 ~70 ~55 [76]
12 gene genomic instability signaturej proliferative index/SSIa breast 469 overall 5 ~70–90% ~40–60% [52]
metastasis-free ~60–80% ~30–50%
lunge 637 overall 5 ~50–60% ~10–40% [93]
ovarian 124 relapse-free 10 ~65% ~15%
67 gene CINSARC signaturek combination of structural aneuploidy, proliferation and tumor grade STSb 127 metastasis-free 5 75–84% 35–48% [94]
STSb (GIST)f 32 metastasis-free 5 100% 61%
10 100% 30%
breast 373 metastasis-free 10 ~75–80% ~35–60%
lymphomag 278 overall 10 ~65–75% ~35–40%
Aurora A expression AURKA mRNA level STSb (GIST)f 60 metastasis-free 5 100% 38% [78]
100% 12%
112 CIN gene signaturel Loss of heterozygosity colon 548 disease-free 5 ~95% ~75% [95]
a

Stemline Scatter Index (SSI) is the percentage of cells in S phase + the percentage of cells > 5c + coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean). S

phase percentage contributes most to SSI.

b

Soft tissue sarcoma.

c

”Tumors were considered aneuploid when a distinct separate second or more G0/G1

peak(s) was present”.

d

based on H&E staining.

e

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

f

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.

g

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

h

To identify the CIN70 and CIN25 gene signatures, the authors inferred aneuploidy based on gene expression data. They then confirmed that in NCI60 cell lines, this correlates with structural aneuploidy as measured by SKY and SNPchip DNA copy number. Tumors with low versus high aneuploidy were compared to identify the 25 or 70 genes with the highest CIN score (designated CIN25 and CIN70). 43/70=61% of CIN70 genes are cell cycle regulated [77].

i

The CIN25 signature is prognostic in 1 lung, 5 breast, 1 mesothelioma, 3 glioma, 1 medulloblastoma and 1 lymphoma cohort, but not in 3 lung, 1 ovarian, 1 lymphoma and 1 prostate cohort.

j

The 12 gene signature was identified by analyzing gene expression data from 48 primary breast carcinomas stratified into 17 diploid genomically stable, 15 aneuploid genomically stable, and 16 aneuploid genomically unstable tumors by SSI. Only Aurora A overlaps with the CIN70 genes.

k

CINSARC (Complexity INdex in SARComa) genes were identified by comparing expression differences between 1) tumors with CGH imbalances of <20 with >35; 2) grade 3 vs grade 2 tumors; 3) CIN70 signature.

l

The 112 CIN gene signature was identified by determining the LOH status in 745 tumors using 9 microsatellite markers representing 4 chromosome arms. An LOH ratio of 33% was used to separate CIN high from CIN low tumors. 25 CIN high and 10 CIN low tumors were used to identify the 112 gene signature. These 112 genes are non-overlapping with the CIN70.