Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 15.
Published in final edited form as: Psychiatry Res. 2013 Jun 19;208(3):232–237. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.04.030

Table 1.

Tetrachoric correlation coefficients (r) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for bulimia nervosa and alcohol use disorder.

MZ DZ
Within Trait BN N* 3768 2634
Concordant/Discordant Pairs** 11 / 63 0 / 55
r (95% CI) 0.63 (0.47; 0.79) −0.02 (−0.47; 0.45)
AUD N* 4024 2860
Concordant/Discordant Pairs* 55 / 175 20 / 141
r (95% CI) 0.65 (0.57; 0.73) 0.42 (0.27; .056)
Cross Trait Within Twin N* 3942 2782
Concordant/Discordant Diagnoses** 20 / 339 10 / 224
r (95% CI) 0.30 (0.18; 0.42) 0.24 (0.08; 0.40)
Cross Twin N* 3882 2741
Concordant/Discordant Pairs* 11 / 346 4 / 224
r (95% CI) 0.14 (0.00; 0.28) 0.02 (−0.21; 0.23)

Note. N*= number of individuals used in the calculation

*

number of concordant affected pairs and number of discordant pairs used in the calculation

**

number of twins with both BN and AUD (concordant) and number of twins with only one diagnosis, BN or AUD (discordant). Within trait (“intraclass correlations”) correlations reflect the correlation of bulimia nervosa and alcohol use disorder between members of twin pairs by zygosity group. Cross-trait, within twin correlations reflect the correlation between bulimia nervosa and alcohol use disorder within individuals. Cross-trait, cross-twin correlations reflect the correlations of bulimia nervosa in one twin with alcohol use disorder in the co-twin by zygosity groups