Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 7;8(8):e71379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071379

Table 1. Input parameters for lung cancer screening model.

Parameter Base case estimate Sensitivity analyses Reference
Costs
Lung cancer screening
Average annual cost of low dose spiral CT screening for lung cancer $210 125%, 150% [7]
Lung cancer treatment in first year of diagnosis
Average cost, Stage A $82,087 n/a [7]
Average cost, Stage B $132,464 n/a [7]
Average cost, Stage C $142,750 n/a [7]
Smoking cessation treatment
Average cost per smoking cessation counseling session $83 n/a Thomson Reuters Marketscan 2010 trended to 2012
Average cost of generic nicotine replacement therapy per quit attempt $228 n/a Thomson Reuters Marketscan 2010 trended to 2012
Average cost of generic bupropion per quit attempt $290 n/a Thomson Reuters Marketscan 2010 trended to 2012
Average cost of varenicline (Chantix) per quit attempt $379 n/a Thomson Reuters Marketscan 2010 trended to 2012
Average health care costs incurred per quit $0 $12,031, $12,093 Base case: [33][35] Sensitivity estimates for light, intensive cessation programs
Survival probabilities %
Estimated annual survival
Male, current smoker 45.7 [32]
Male, ex-smoker 63.0 +/−5% [32]
Male, never smoker 68.0 [32]
Female, current smoker 64.6 [32]
Female, ex-smoker 69.6 +/−5% [32]
Female, never smoker 82.8 [32]
Lung cancer survival
Male, Stage A 90.4–96.6 [6]
Male, Stage B 71.8–89.9 [6]
Male, Stage C 26.3–73.7 [6]
Female, Stage A 92.1–97.4 [6]
Female, Stage B 72.6–90.9 [6]
Female, Stage C 27.4–76.0 [6]
Screening probabilities
Baseline LDCT scan
Negative result (no nodules present or semi-positive) 79.0 [30], personal communication with C. Henschke
Positive result (nodule>5 mm) 21.0 [30], personal communication with C. Henschke
Follow-up scan in 3 months given positive result 19.0 [30], personal communication with C. Henschke
Repeat scan at 1 year given follow-up scan 99.0 [30], personal communication with C. Henschke
Biopsy given follow-up scan 1.0 [30], personal communication with C. Henschke
Surgery given biopsy after follow-up scan 90.0 [30], personal communication with C. Henschke
Biopsy given positive result 2.0 [30], personal communication with C. Henschke
Repeat scan at 1 year given biopsy 76.0 [30], personal communication with C. Henschke
Surgery given biopsy 24.0 [30], personal communication with C. Henschke
Repeat LDCT scan (annual)
Negative result (no nodules present or semi-positive) 93.0 [30], personal communication with C. Henschke
Positive result (nodule>5 mm) 7.0 [30], personal communication with C. Henschke
Antibiotics and follow-up scan within 1 month given positive result 3.0 [30], personal communication with C. Henschke
Repeat scan at 1 year given antibiotics and follow-up scan 5.0 [30], personal communication with C. Henschke
Additional follow-up scan at 3 months given antibiotics and follow-up scan 95.0 [30], personal communication with C. Henschke
Biopsy given additional follow-up scan 5.0 [30], personal communication with C. Henschke
Surgery given biopsy after antibiotics and follow-up scan 90.0 [30], personal communication with C. Henschke
Biopsy given antibiotics and follow-up scan 1.0 [30], personal communication with C. Henschke
Surgery given biopsy after antibiotics and follow-up scan 90.0 [30], personal communication with C. Henschke
Follow-up scan within 6 months given positive result 4.0 [30], personal communication with C. Henschke
Repeat scan at 1 year given follow-up scan 99.0 [30], personal communication with C. Henschke
Biopsy given follow-up scan 1.0 [30], personal communication with C. Henschke
Surgery given biopsy after follow-up scan 90.0 [30], personal communication with C. Henschke
Lung cancer probabilities % %
Status quo
Stage A 17.4 [5]
Stage B 14.6 [5]
Stage C 68.0 [5]
Lung cancer screening New York ELCAP NLST
Stage A 79.3 63.0 [10], [30]
Stage B 16.2 16.5 [10], [30]
Stage C 4.5 20.5 [10], [30]
Smoking probabilities, % %
Male, aged 18+, current smoker 21.2 [28]
Male, aged 18+, ex-smoker 25.5 [28]
Female, aged 18+, current smoker 17.5 [28]
Female, aged 18+, ex-smoker 17.3 [28]
Probability of participation in smoking cessation treatment among current smokers 19.2 +/−10% Calculated from [28]
Annual reduction in smoking prevalence with increasing age (Background quit rate) 2.5 Calculated from [28]
Effectiveness of smoking cessation intervention at 12 months Odds ratio
Light cessation intervention (behavioral treatment only) 1.5 (midpoint of 1.3–1.7) [37]
Pharmacological treatment only 2.55 (midpoint of 1.5–3.6) [37]
Combined behavioral and pharmacological treatment, over either intervention alone 1.5 (midpoint of 1.3–1.7) [37]
Intensive cessation intervention (combined behavioral and pharmacological treatment) 3.04 Calculated from [37]
Quality-adjusted life years Utility weight
Utility for general population, by age
Males, aged 50–59 0.819 +/−10% [33]
Males, aged 60–69 0.803 +/−10% [33]
Males, aged 70–79 0.770 +/−10% [33]
Males, aged 80–89 0.742 +/−10% [33]
Females, aged 50–59 0.788 +/−10% [33]
Females, aged 60–69 0.784 +/−10% [33]
Females, aged 70–79 0.748 +/−10% [33]
Females, aged 80–89 0.700 +/−10% [33]
Utility weights for lung cancer patients
Stage A 0.823 +/−10% [34]
Stage B 0.772 +/−10% [34]
Stage C 0.573 +/−10% [34]
QALYs saved by smoking cessation
Males, aged 55–64 2.25 [38]
Females, aged 55–64 2.01 [38]

Unless stated, all costs are presented in 2012 dollars.