Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 7;8(8):e72068. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072068

Table 2. Differences in Kruskal-Wallis statistics to identify intergroup differences between the samples for BMI according to chronological age and BMI according to height-age in boys.

Age (years) Kruskal-Wallis statistic BMI-for-chronological age Kruskal-Wallis statistic BMI-for-height-age Difference between Kruskal-Wallis statistics
1 3.77 4.99 -1.22
2 1.79 1.97 -0.18
3 8.71 13.04 -4.33
4 1.04 8.04 -7.00
5 11.08 3.33 7.75
6 8.54 3.92 4.62
7 5.31 2.10 3.21
8 16.21 2.03 14.18
9 10.38 3.91 6.47
10 7.63 0.89 6.74
11 9.51 0.37 9.14
12 1.79 4.66 -2.87
13 22.63 1.06 21.57
14 2.11 1.63 0.48
15 0.07 1.69 -1.62
16 5.90 0.20 5.70
17 2.94 2.73 0.21
Total 62.85*
*

P=0.019

To test whether the median BMI differed according to height-SDS we calculated the Kruskal-Wallis statistics (KW). In order to examine whether BMI-for-age would result in more similar BMI distributions than BMI-for-height-age, per age group differences between the KWs were calculated and summed. Subsequently, a permutation test was used to test whether these differences were statistically significant. A positive difference in KW means that height related BMI differences were larger for BMI-for-age as compared to BMI-for-height-age.