Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 8;4:307. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00307

Table 4.

Contingency table of the expression of genes responsive to n-ButOH as compared to the response to R59022 (A) or to edelfosine (B).

Observed (Theoretical) ratio Total
Edelfosine > control Edelfosine <> control Edelfosine < control
A
n-ButOH > tert-ButOH 91 1077 82 1250
(21.59) (1201.68) (26.73)
4.21 0.90 3.06
n-ButOH <> tert-ButOH 277 20531 268 21076
(364.00) (20261.26) (450.75)
0.76 1.01 0.59
n-ButOH < tert-ButOH 39 1047 154 1240
(21.42) (1192.06) (26.52)
1.86 0.88 5.81
Total 407 22655 504 23566
R59022 > control R59022 <> control R59022 < control
B
n-ButOH > tert-ButOH 37 1248 17 1302
(9.53) (1286.18) (6.30)
3.88 0.97 2.70
n-ButOH <> tert-ButOH 122 21458 61 21641
(158.32) (21378.02) (104.65)
0.77 1.14 0.58
n-ButOH < tert-ButOH 18 1194 39 1251
(9.15) (1235.80) (6.05)
1.97 0.97 6.45
Total 177 23900 117 24194

For each category, the number of observed genes can be compared to that of theoretical genes, indicated between brackets, considering the expression of genes to the 2 molecules, separately, are independent. The ratio “number of observed genes” vs. “theoretical number” is in bold.