Table 3.
W | L | MW | ML | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Centre Forward versus Perimeter Players (%) | ||||
Even | ||||
Centre forward | 50±8 (41-59) |
50±11 (32-69) |
54±11 (30-72) |
48±9 (34-64) |
Perimeter player | 50±8 (41-59) |
50±11 (31-68) |
46±11 (28-70) |
52±9 (36-66) |
Offensive Arrangements | ||||
Even | ||||
6vs6 and 5vs5 | 92±6 (81-100)** |
96±4 (90-100) ‡‡,*** |
88±9 (70-100) |
84±10 (66-100) |
4vs4 and 3vs3 | 5±4 (0-12)* |
3±3 (0-9)*** |
6±5 (0-15) |
10±7 (0-20) |
2vs2 and 1vs1 | 3±4 (0-11)* |
1±2 (0-6)*** |
6±7 (0-19)** |
7±5 (0-17) |
Power-play | ||||
4:2/perimeter player | 65±16 (33-89) |
69±15 (50-90) |
64±22 (14-90) |
63±14 (33-78) |
4:2/centre forward | 25±10 (11-40) |
23±14 (0-50) |
32±19 (0-71) |
23±14 (0-44) |
3:3/perimeter player | 10±11 (0-33) |
7±11 (0-29) |
5±6 (0-14)** |
14±11 (0-33) |
3:3/centre forward | 0 | 1±2 (0-8) |
0 | 0 |
Defensive Arrangment (%) | ||||
Even | ||||
“Pressing” | 40±14 (19-70)#,*** |
37±12 (18-55) ‡‡,*** |
52±14 (32-81) |
60±17 (34-83) |
“Zone 1-2” | 35±10 (19-53)‡‡‡,*** |
43±16 (17-62) ‡‡‡,*** |
16±10 (0-30) |
16±17 (0-52) |
“Zone M” | 9±7 (0-24) |
6±6 (0-15) |
6±6 (0-21) |
6±6 (0-23) |
“Zone 2-3-4” | 16±10 (3-31)‡ |
14±9 (3-26)‡‡ |
25±11 (7-42) |
17±12 (3-40) |
Power-play | ||||
“cluster” | 93±7 (80-100)* |
88±10 (67-100) |
80±18 (50-100) |
80±21 (33-100) |
“anticipating” | 7±7 (0-20)* |
12±10 (0-33) |
20±18 (0-50) |
20±21 (0-67) |
‡, ‡‡ and ‡‡‡indicate differences (p < 0.05, 0.01 and 0.001 respectively) with respect to MW; *, ** and *** indicate differences (p < 0.05, 0.01 and 0.001 respectively) with respect to ML.