Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 8.
Published in final edited form as: Atherosclerosis. 2012 Feb 23;222(1):129–134. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.02.029

Table 2.

Estimated differences in median PAT volume (cm3) between different subgroups of patients. Beside the estimated difference, we reported also 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) of the difference in median levels. Multivariate analysis was adjusted for age, gender, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes and BMI using median regression.

Univariate analysis
Difference in median PAT volume		 Multivariate analysis
Difference in median PAT volume
Any CAD vs. no CAD 36.5 [95%CI: 26.9–46.1] cm3 19.7 [95%CI: 7.4–31.9] cm3
High-risk lesions vs. no high-risk CAD 42.0 [95%CI: 10.7–73.2] cm3 39.8 [95%CI: 6.5–73.1] cm3
High-risk lesions vs. no CAD 77.0 [95%CI: 42.8–111.1] cm3 40.1 [95%CI: 12.1–63.9] cm3