Table 2.

CASPAR Qualitative Implementation Analysis Participants

	Organization Status	Primary Funding Source*	Total Capacity	Acreditation**	Counselors Interviewed	Directors Interviewed
Project A
Site 1	Non-profit, Private	State	270	None	2	1
Site 2	Non-profit, Private	State	300	None	2	1
Site 3	Non-profit, Private	Private insurance	102	State, JCAHO	1	1
Site 4	Non-profit, Private	Private insurance	100	JCAHO	2	1
Site 5	Non-profit, Private	Private insurance	140	JCAHO	1	2
Site 6	For-profit, Private	Private insurance	180	State	3	1
Site 7	For-profit, Private	Private insurance	106	None	2	0***
Site 8	Non-profit, Public	State, Public managed care	270	CARF	1	1
				Total	14	8
Project B
Site 9	Non-profit, Private	Self-pay	85	State	1	2
Site 10	Non-profit	State	40	None	2	2
Site 11	Non-profit	State	320	None	2	1
Site 12	Non-profit	State	275	JCAHO	5	2
Site 13	Non-profit	State	60	None	1	1
Site 14	Non-profit	Self-pay, State	48	JCAHO, State	2	1
Site 15	Non-profit	State	99	None	1	3
Site 16	Non-profit	State	40	None	2	1
				Total	16	13

NOTE: Program characteristics were collected as part of the replication projects with using the Addiction Treatment Inventory (ATI; Carise et al., 2000)

^*Programs were asked about the percent of their funding that came from different sources; primary funding source is defined as the source (or sources) comprising the majority of funding (>50%).

^**State accreditation for Project A sites were granted from the Pennsylvania Bureau of Drug & Alcohol Programs (BDAP); State accreditation for Project B sites were granted from the New Jersey Division of Addiction Services (DAS).

^***Sites 6 and 7 in Project A had the same director.