Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 18;142(6):1009–1018. doi: 10.3945/jn.111.157222

TABLE 2.

RR (95% CI) of chronic disease by quintile of the HEI-2005 among women in the Nurses’ Health Study (1984–2008) and men in the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (1986–2008)1

HEI-2005
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 P-linear trend2
Major chronic disease
 Women
  Range <53.5 53.5–60.0 60.1–65.3 65.4–71.3 >71.3
  Median 48.6 57.1 62.7 68.2 75.4
  Cases, n 5901 5287 5224 5166 5181
  Age-adjusted 1.0 (ref) 0.84 (0.81, 0.88) 0.80 (0.77, 0.83) 0.75 (0.72, 0.78) 0.68 (0.66, 0.71) <0.001
  Multivariate-adjusted3 1.0 (ref) 0.91 (0.88, 0.95) 0.90 (0.87, 0.94) 0.88 (0.84, 0.91) 0.84 (0.80, 0.87) <0.001
 Men
  Range <53.6 52.6–60.0 60.0–66.3 66.3–73.2 >73.2
  Median 47.0 56.6 63.1 69.5 77.7
  Cases, n 3373 3178 3052 2990 2965
  Age-adjusted 1.0 (ref) 0.90 (0.85, 0.94) 0.83 (0.79, 0.87) 0.80 (0.76, 0.84) 0.74 (0.70, 0.78) <0.001
  Multivariate-adjusted 1.0 (ref) 0.95 (0.90,1.00) 0.90 (0.85, 0.95) 0.89 (0.85, 0.94) 0.84 (0.80, 0.89) <0.001
 Pooled
  Multivariate-adjusted 1.0 (ref) 0.93 (0.89, 0.96) 0.90 (0.87, 0.93) 0.88 (0.85, 0.91) 0.84 (0.81, 0.87) <0.001
Cardiovascular disease
  Women
  Cases, n 1168 980 932 896 892
  Multivariate-adjusted 1.0 (ref) 0.89 (0.82, 0.97) 0.87 (0.79, 0.95) 0.81 (0.74, 0.89) 0.75 (0.68, 0.82) <0.001
 Men
  Cases, n 1082 1057 1019 982 962
  Multivariate-adjusted 1.0 (ref) 0.97 (0.89, 1.06) 0.91 (0.83, 1.00) 0.89 (0.81, 0.98) 0.84 (0.76, 0.92) <0.001
 Pooled
  Multivariate-adjusted 1.0 (ref) 0.93 (0.85, 1.02) 0.89 (0.84, 0.95) 0.85 (0.78, 0.93) 0.79 (0.71, 0.88) <0.0014
Coronary heart disease
 Women
  Cases, n 469 376 375 337 329
  Multivariate-adjusted 1.0 (ref) 0.88 (0.77, 1.02) 0.92 (0.80, 1.06) 0.81 (0.70, 0.94) 0.75 (0.64, 0.87) <0.001
 Men
  Cases, n 548 495 472 475 433
  Multivariate-adjusted 1.0 (ref) 0.93 (0.82, 1.05) 0.86 (0.75, 0.98) 0.90 (0.79, 1.03) 0.77 (0.67, 0.89) 0.02
 Pooled
  Multivariate-adjusted 1.0 (ref) 0.91 (0.83, 0.99) 0.89 (0.81, 0.98) 0.86 (0.78, 0.95) 0.76 (0.68, 0.84) <0.001
Stroke
 Women
  Cases, n 380 345 353 332 351
  Multivariate-adjusted 1.0 (ref) 0.93 (0.80, 1.08) 0.96 (0.82, 1.11) 0.86 (0.74, 1.01) 0.82 (0.70, 0.96) 0.01
 Men
  Cases, n 218 218 200 186 189
  Multivariate-adjusted 1.0 (ref) 1.02 (0.84, 1.24) 0.91 (0.74, 1.04) 0.84 (0.68, 1.04) 0.82 (0.66, 1.02) 0.02
 Pooled
  Multivariate-adjusted 1.0 (ref) 0.96 (0.86, 1.09) 0.94 (0.83, 1.06) 0.86 (0.75, 0.97) 0.82 (0.72, 0.93) <0.001
Diabetes
  Women
  Cases, n 1367 1302 1171 1064 976
  Multivariate-adjusted 1.0 (ref) 0.97 (0.90, 1.05) 0.91 (0.84, 0.99) 0.84 (0.77, 0.92) 0.83 (0.76, 0.90) <0.001
 Men
  Cases, n 573 540 494 462 388
  Multivariate-adjusted 1.0 (ref) 0.96 (0.85, 1.08) 0.91 (0.80, 1.03) 0.89 (0.78, 1.01) 0.82 (0.71, 0.94) 0.003
 Pooled
  Multivariate-adjusted 1.0 (ref) 0.97 (0.91, 1.03) 0.91 (0.85, 0.98) 0.86 (0.80, 0.92) 0.82 (0.76, 0.89) <0.001
Cancer
 Women
  Cases, n 2510 2352 2387 2530 2590
  Multivariate-adjusted 1.0 (ref) 0.93 (0.88, 0.99) 0.93 (0.88, 0.98) 0.95 (0.90, 1.01) 0.93 (0.87, 0.98) 0.04
 Men
  Cases, n 1204 1067 1063 1113 1136
  Multivariate-adjusted 1.0 (ref) 0.87 (0.80, 0.95) 0.86 (0.79, 0.93) 0.89 (0.81, 0.97) 0.86 (0.79, 0.94) 0.003
 Pooled
  Multivariate-adjusted 1.0 (ref) 0.91 (0.85, 0.97) 0.90 (0.83, 0.97) 0.93 (0.86, 0.99) 0.90 (0.84, 0.96) 0.001
1

HEI, Healthy Eating Index; Q, quintile; ref, reference.

2

Test for linear trend calculated by assigning the median value of diet score in each quintile and modeling this as a continuous variable in regression models.

3

Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age (in mo), energy (kcal/d, continuous), smoking status (5 categories), BMI (8 categories), aspirin (0, 1–6, ≥7 d/wk), physical activity (5 categories), vitamin E supplementation, family history of myocardial infarction, and family history of colon cancer; in the analysis in women, models adjusted for family history of breast cancer, menopausal status, and use of hormone therapy. All models were adjusted for history of hypertension and history of hypercholesterolemia, except where cancer was the only outcome.

4

-heterogeneity between studies <0.05 based on the Cochran Q statistic.