Table 2. Mean metal concentrations, two water supply schemes, Nigeria, 2010–2011.
Location sampled | Mean upper 95% CI limit of concentrationa (mg/l) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cd | Co | Cr | Mn | Pb | |
Asejire water supply scheme | |||||
Consumer tap waterb | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.23 | 0.10 | 0.25 |
Treatment works | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.25 | 0.13 | 0.18 |
Dam water | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.34 | 0.43 | 0.49 |
Eleyele water supply scheme | |||||
Consumer tap waterb | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.23 | 0.31 |
Treatment works | 0.02 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.24 | 0.29 |
Dam water | 0.43 | 0.17 | 0.43 | 0.54 | 0.66 |
WHO MCL1 | 0.003 | 0.10c,d | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.01 |
Cd, cadmium; CI, confidence interval; Co, cobalt; Cr, chromium; MCL, maximum contaminant level; Mn, manganese; Pb, lead; WHO, World Health Organization.
a The mean annual upper 95% confidence interval (CI) limit for the concentration was calculated from the mean upper 95% CI limit of the concentration in the dry season (Cd) and the mean upper 95% CI limit of the concentration in the wet season (Cw) by assuming that the dry season lasted 4 months and the wet season, 8 months and using the formula: ((Cd × 4) + (Cw × 8))⁄12.
b The mean upper 95% CI limit of the concentration in consumer tap water during the wet and dry seasons was calculated by averaging measurements in all supply areas for a particular scheme during the respective season.
c Maximum contaminant level from the environmental media evaluation guide for children (California Department of Public Health).11
d Maximum contaminant level from health-based groundwater quality criteria (New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.)12