Table 2. Theoretical predictions of the genomic location of sex-biased genes in aphids.
Theoretical predictions: | Empirical test of Predictions 3: Genomic location of sex-biased genes | |||||||
Predictions 1: Preferred location for mutations with antagonistic effects (based on the analytical model and on our simulations) | Predictions 2: Expression pattern of sexually antagonist mutations after the evolution of modifiers of gene expression | Predictions 3: Combination of Predictions 1 and 2 | Random expectations: All genes: #X∶#A = 497∶3215, f (X) = 0.13Genes with >5 reads: #X∶#A = 390∶2930, f (X) = 0.12 | |||||
Fitness effect of the mutation | threshold for expression bias | #X∶#A | f(X) | % deviation | X2 test P-value | |||
sm>0, sf<0, sa<0 | X | M+F−A− | M+F−A−: enriched on the X | 2-fold | 63∶205 | 0.24 | +100% | <10−8 |
5-fold | 54∶118 | 0.31 | +167% | <10−14 | ||||
10-fold | 44∶87 | 0.34 | +186% | <10−14 | ||||
sm>0, sf>0, sa<0 | X | M+F+A− | M+F+A−: enriched on the X | 2-fold | 6∶17 | 0.26 | +122% | 0.033 |
5-fold | 6∶6 | 0.50 | +326% | 0.0001 | ||||
10-fold | 4∶3 | 0.57 | +386% | 0.0002 | ||||
sm<0, sf>0, sa>0 | A | M−F−A+ | M−F−A+: depleted on the X | 2-fold | 11∶153 | 0.07 | −43% | 0.045 |
5-fold | 4∶104 | 0.04 | −68% | 0.009 | ||||
10-fold | 3∶81 | 0.04 | −70% | 0.020 | ||||
sm<0, sf>0, sa>0 | A | M−F+A+ | M−F+A+: depleted on the X | 2-fold | 2∶69 | 0.03 | −76% | 0.019 |
5-fold | 1∶21 | 0.05 | −61% | 0.29 | ||||
10-fold | 1∶12 | 0.08 | −35% | 0.65 | ||||
sm<0, sf>0, sa<0 | Slight bias towards A | M−F+A− | M−F+A−: slight bias towards A | 2-fold | 19∶193 | 0.09 | −24% | 0.21 |
5-fold | 8∶72 | 0.10 | −15% | 0.63 | ||||
10-fold | 3∶40 | 0.07 | −41% | 0.33 | ||||
sm>0, sf<0, sa>0 | Slight bias towards X | M+F−A+ | M+F−A+: slight bias towards X | 2-fold | 7∶73 | 0.09 | −26% | 0.41 |
5-fold | 3∶51 | 0.06 | −53% | 0.16 | ||||
10-fold | 2∶22 | 0.08 | −29% | 0.60 |
The preferred chromosomal locations of sexually antagonistic mutations (Prediction 1) are based on the simulations presented in Figure 2. Prediction 2: Predicted evolution of expression pattern of a gene bearing a sexually antagonist mutation after the evolution of a modifier that reduces the expression in the harmed sex (M, F and A refer to male, sexual female and asexual female, respectively, and the sign represents relative expression in each morph). The genomic locations of sex-biased genes (Predictions 3) were obtained by combining Predictions1 and 2. Theoretical predictions 3 were then tested with empirical data by looking at the genomic location of sex-biased genes, when considering different levels of fold-change in expression (2-, 5-, 10-fold difference). Observed number of genes for X and autosomes, frequency of X-linkage, % deviation from random expectation of X-linkage (f (X) = 0.12) and its significance (Chi-square tests) are also given.