Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 8;8(8):e73639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073639

Table 2. Proportion of patients with >10% and mean percent improvement in eGFR at 48 weeks from the baseline calculated by the four equations.

Cases with >10% increase from baseline P value (95% CI) Mean % improvement in eGFR from baseline Difference in mean % improvement (95% CI)
(DRV/r + RAL versus LPV/r + TDF/FTC)
P value
CG equation
DRV/r + RAL 6/24 0.272 (-0.067 to 0.354) 5.4% -8.7% (-18.2 to 0.8) 0.071
LPV/r + TDF/FTC 3/28 -3.3%
JSN equation
DRV/r + RAL 4/24 0.688 (-0.126 to 0.267) 2.5% -1.1% (-6.9 to 4.8) 0.720
LPV/r + TDF/FTC 3/29 1.5%
CKD-EPI equation
DRV/r + RAL 2/24 1.000 (-0.148 to 0.197) 1.9% -1.6% (-4.7 to 1.6) 0.323
LPV/r + TDF/FTC 2/29 1.7%
MDRD equation
DRV/r + RAL 5/24 0.444 (-0.093 to 0.313) 2.7% -1.1% (-6.9 to 4.8) 0.722
LPV/r + TDF/FTC 3/29 1.7%

DRV/r: ritonavir-boosted darunavir, RAL: raltegravir, LPV/r: ritonavir-boosted lopinavir, TDF: tenofovir, FTC: emtricitabine, CG: Cockcroft-Gault equation [35], JSN: the Japanese Society of Nephrology equation [37], CKD-EPI: Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation adjusted for the Japanese[38], MDRD: the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation adjusted with coefficient for the Japanese [37]