Table 3. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of HIV infection.
Factors | Reference group | B | s.e. | Wald | P | Exp (B) | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average monthly income 2001–3000 Yuan | Other income groups | 6.842 | 3.216 | 4.527 | 0.033 | 6.341 | 1.714–12.544 |
HIV-positive sex partner | No HIV-positive sex partner | 1.663 | 0.618 | 7.249 | 0.007 | 5.273 | 1.572–17.691 |
More than 16 sex partners in the last 6 months | Less than 16 sex partners in the last 6 months | 0.162 | 0.072 | 5.083 | 0.024 | 1.175 | 1.021–1.353 |
Had anal sex less than 10 times in the last month | Had anal sex more than 10 times in the last month | −6.001 | 2.425 | 6.121 | 0.013 | 0.002 | 0.000–0.287 |
Insertive anal sex | Recipient and both | −7.913 | 3.300 | 5.750 | 0.016 | 0.116 | 0.000–0.236 |
Sometimes used condomsa when having anal sex in the last 6 months | Always used condoms | 7.105 | 2.385 | 8.873 | 0.003 | 7.601 | 1.359–23.083 |
Rectal trauma with bleeding in the last 6 months | No bleeding | 1.081 | 0.414 | 6.802 | 0.009 | 2.947 | 1.308–6.638 |
Did not use condoms at last sexual encounter | Used condoms at last sexual encounter | 0.772 | 0.366 | 4.456 | 0.035 | 1.278 | 1.012–5.595 |
Engaged in commercial sex | Did not engage in commercial sex | 2.768 | 1.079 | 6.585 | 0.010 | 5.925 | 1.923–13.890 |
‘Sometimes used condoms' refers to MSM who did not insist on condom use during sexual encounters. This is compared to ‘always used condoms' and ‘never used condoms'. ‘Always used condoms' refers to MSM who correctly used condoms during every sexual encounter. ‘Never used condoms' refers to MSM who never used condoms during sexual encounters.