Skip to main content
. 2013 May 27;15(4):545–549. doi: 10.1038/aja.2013.51

Table 3. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of HIV infection.

Factors Reference group B s.e. Wald P Exp (B) 95% CI
Average monthly income 2001–3000 Yuan Other income groups 6.842 3.216 4.527 0.033 6.341 1.714–12.544
HIV-positive sex partner No HIV-positive sex partner 1.663 0.618 7.249 0.007 5.273 1.572–17.691
More than 16 sex partners in the last 6 months Less than 16 sex partners in the last 6 months 0.162 0.072 5.083 0.024 1.175 1.021–1.353
Had anal sex less than 10 times in the last month Had anal sex more than 10 times in the last month −6.001 2.425 6.121 0.013 0.002 0.000–0.287
Insertive anal sex Recipient and both −7.913 3.300 5.750 0.016 0.116 0.000–0.236
Sometimes used condomsa when having anal sex in the last 6 months Always used condoms 7.105 2.385 8.873 0.003 7.601 1.359–23.083
Rectal trauma with bleeding in the last 6 months No bleeding 1.081 0.414 6.802 0.009 2.947 1.308–6.638
Did not use condoms at last sexual encounter Used condoms at last sexual encounter 0.772 0.366 4.456 0.035 1.278 1.012–5.595
Engaged in commercial sex Did not engage in commercial sex 2.768 1.079 6.585 0.010 5.925 1.923–13.890
a

‘Sometimes used condoms' refers to MSM who did not insist on condom use during sexual encounters. This is compared to ‘always used condoms' and ‘never used condoms'. ‘Always used condoms' refers to MSM who correctly used condoms during every sexual encounter. ‘Never used condoms' refers to MSM who never used condoms during sexual encounters.