Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 21;12(5):690–696. doi: 10.1038/aja.2010.37

Table 2. Analysis of genotype frequencies in NOS2 gene polymorphisms between control and BPH subjects.

SNP (locus) Genotype Group
Model OR (95% CI) P-value
Control
BPH
n = 205 (%) n = 229 (%)
rs2779248 T/T 148 (72.2) 182 (79.5) Codominant 0.79 (0.53–1.17) 0.240
  Promoter T/C 55 (26.8) 40 (17.5) Dominant 0.66 (0.42–1.04) 0.074
  −278 C/C 2 (1.0) 7 (3.1) Recessive 2.93 (0.59–14.61) 0.160
rs10459953 G/G 69 (33.7) 66 (28.8) Codominant 1.16 (0.88–1.52) 0.290
  5′UTR C/G 94 (45.9) 109 (47.6) Dominant 1.23 (0.81–1.87) 0.340
  C/C 42 (20.5) 54 (23.6) Recessive 1.21 (0.75–1.94) 0.430
rs2297518 G/G 164 (80.0) 168 (73.4) Codominant 1.54 (0.99–2.39) 0.053
  Missense A/G 41 (20.0) 56 (24.4) Dominant 1.47 (0.92–2.34) 0.100
  Ser608Leu A/A 0 (0.0) 5 (2.2) Recessive   0.040*

Abbreviations: 5′UTR, 5′-untranslated region; BPH, benign prostatic hyperplasia; CI, confidence interval; n, number of subjects; NOS2, nitric oxide synthase 2; OR, odds ratio; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.

Note: P-values were obtained from logistic regression analyses with the codominant, dominant and recessive models without Bonferroni correction.

*

P-value was tested using Fisher's exact test.