Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2013 Jun;16(2):101–145. doi: 10.1007/s10567-013-0130-6

Table 2.

Attachment & Parent-Child Relationships

Study Country of origin Severity of deprivation Age at assessment N Construct measured Outcome measure Age at adoption: Distribution Age at adoption: Measurement Statistical test Significant effect of age at adoption? Form of the relationship? Relationship with other variables?
Positive Results
Cederblad, Höök, Irhammer, & Merke (1999) Multiple 13–27y 147 presence or absence of attachment with parent or sibs parent interview 54% < 7m; 30% > 1y < 1y, > 1y at adoption and < 6m or > 6m in institution yes, but no statistical test
Gleitman & Savaya (2011) Israel Adequate 11–19.5y 169 communication with parents Family/Parental Relationships Family/Parental Relationships module of Student Questionnaire (self-report) 0–9y; 57.4% < 2y, 42.6 2–9.5y Continuous correlation yes
Tan & Marfo (2006) China1 Socially-emotionally Socially emotionally depriving 1.5y–11y (retrospective) 695 initial rejecting behaviors (early relationship with adoptive mother) parent interview preschool: M = 14.2m, SD = 8.3m; school-age: M = 18.5m, SD = 23.7m continuous, log transformed correlation yes
Tan, Marfo, & Dedrick (2007) China1 Socially-emotionally depriving 1.5y–5y (retrospective) SN = 63 Non-SN = 689 initiala daptation to adoption (early relationship with adoptive mother) parent interview SN: M = 25.85, SD = 10.82; Non-SN: M = 12.71, SD = 4.87 continuous multiple regression yes
China1 Socially-emotionally depriving 6y–15.7y (retrospective) SN = 61 Non-SN = 280 initial adaptation to adoption (early relationship with adoptive mother) parent interview SN: M = 46.98, SD = 37.45; Non-SN: M = 15.61, SD = 15.80 continuous multiple regression yes
Tan, Marfo, & Dedrick (2010) China1 Socially-emotionally depriving 1.5y–5y (retrospective) 452 initial adaptation to adoption (early relationship with adoptive mother) parent interview 3–50m; M = 13.1m, SD = 5.1m continuous, natural log transformed correlation yes
van den Dries, Juffer, van Ijzendoorn, & Bakermans-Kranenburg (2009) Multiple all ages 17 studies, 722 participants attachment security various measures < 12m, > 12m Q (compared effect sizes) yes
Mixed Results
Croft, O’Connor, Keaveney, Groothues, Rutter, & the ERA Study Team (2001) Romania Globally depriving 4y, 6y 165 parent-child relationship coded observations: Parent Positivity, Parent Negativity, Child Positivity, Child Negativity 52 < 6m, 586–24m, 4824–42m continuous and < 6m, 6–24m, > 24m correlation; multiple regression yes; effect disappears when later-adoptees (> 24m) are removed from analyses mediated by cognitive ability
O’Connor, Marvin, Rutter, Olrick, Britner, & the ERA Study Team (2003) Romania Globally depriving 4y 111 attachment security separation and reunion procedure 58 < 6m, 597–24m continuous and < 6m, 7–24m chi-squared no
Romania Globally depriving 4y 111 attachment organization2 separation and reunion procedure 58 < 6m, 597–24m continuous and < 6m, 7–24m chi-squared yes
Habersaat, Tessier, & Pierrehumbert (2011) Multiple 12–18y 350 attachment security parent questionnaire (measure not named) 83 < 6m, 526–12m, 4312–24m, 172 > 24m < 6m, 6–12m, 12–24m, > 24m yes, for < 6m and > 24m; no for < 12m and > 12m
Smyke, Zeanah, Fox, Nelson, & Guthrie (2010) Romania Globally depriving3 3.5y 68 attachment security separation and reunion procedure > 6m4 dichotimized at various points (18m, 20m, 22m, 24m, 26m, 28m) chi-squared yes; only for cut-offs of 24m and later deflection point (24m) evident
Romania Globally depriving3 3.5y 68 attachment organization2 separation and reunion procedure > 6m4 dichotimized at various points (18m, 20m, 22m, 24m, 26m, 28m) chi-squared yes (at all age at adoption cutoffs) possibly linear
Null Results
Ames (1997) Romania Globally depriving most 4.5y; some 5.5–9y 46 attachment security separation and reunion procedure 8–68m; Md = 18.5m5 continuous5 no
Chisholm, Carter, Ames, & Morison (1995) Romania Globally depriving3 1y5m–6y4m 46 attachment security 23-item Attachment Q-sort (parent-report) 8–68m; Md = 18.5m continuous correlation no
Romania Globally depriving3 1y5m–6y4m 46 parent’s attachment to child Parenting Stress Index parent attachment subscale (parent-report) 8–68m; Md = 18.5m continuous correlation no
Barcons, Abrines, Brun, Sartini, Fumadó, & Marre (2012) Multiple 8–11y 116 attachment security Friends and Family Interview (self-report) 1–103m; M = 30.61m, SD = 21.94m < 12m, 13–36m, > 36m chi-squared no
Multiple 8–11y 116 relationship with parents BASC subscale (self-report) 1–103m; M = 30.61m, SD = 21.94m continuous linear regression no
Cohen & Farnia (2011) China1 8m–4y 70 attachment security 23-item Attachment Q-sort (parent-report) 18–21m; M = 13m continuous regression no
Marcovitch, Goldberg, Gold, Washington, Wasson, Krekewich, & Handley-Derry (1997) Romania Globally depriving 3–5y 56 attachment organization2 separation and reunion procedure 0–48m; 37 < 6m, 19 > 6m no
Nielsen, Coleman, Guinn, & Robb (2004) Ug and a Various levels of deprivation 1–3y 33 child’s need for physical contact with adult observation of free play 3m–3y; M = 1.5y, SD = .67y6 < 1y, 1–2y, 2–3y6 MANCOVA no
Niemann & Weiss (2012) Multiple 1–2y 22 attachment security 90-item Attachment Q-sort (experimenter tested) 6–19m; M = 12.27m continuous correlation no
Tan (2006) China1 Socially-emotionally depriving2 6–8y (retrospective) 115 initial rejecting behaviors (early relationship with adoptive mother) parent interview < 2y; M = about 9m, SD = about 4.5m continuous multiple regression no
Tizard & Hodges (1978) UK Adequate 8y 25 attachment security parent interview most 2–4y; 54.5–7.5y no

Note. Top section includes positive results, middle section includes mixed results, bottom section indicates null results

SN = special needs, m = months, y = years, M = mean, Md = median, SD = standard deviation, BASC = Behavior Assessment System for Children

1

The vast majority of children adopted from China are female

2

Attachment Organization refers to the distinction between MacArthur’s categories of secure (B), avoidant (A), and ambivalent-dependent (C), vs. disorganized-controlling (D) and insecure-other (I–O)

3

This article did not provide information about the conditions of these institutions, but other studies from the same authors on the same sample did describe the severity of the deprivation.

4

In this study, children moved from an institution to foster care (not an adoptive home) at this age

5

This study used time in the orphanage instead of age at adoption; these two variables were correlated at r = .97

6

This study assessed children who were still institutionalized, so duration of institutionalization was assessed rather than age at adoption