Skip to main content
editorial
. 2010 Jan 29;12(1):47–58. doi: 10.1038/aja.2009.14

Table 2. Comparison of fifth World Health Organization (WHO) manual for normal morphology values with recently published literature values.

Author Population1 Cut-off value
Fertile Subfertile Infertile TZI AI
Van Zyl et al. 23, 29, 31 In vivo pregnancies 20 10 3    
Kruger et al. 32, 33 IVF fertilization rates          
   Initial published intervals   ≥ 15 14–4 ≤ 3    
   Intervals as used in practice   ≥ 15 14–5 ≤ 4    
Eggert-Kruse et al. 34 In vivo pregnancies 14 7 4    
Ombelet et al. 35            
   Tenth percentile Fertile population 10        
   ROC curve analysis Fertile vs. subfertile 5        
Zinaman et al. 36 Healthy couples 8        
Günalp et al. 38 Fertile vs. subfertile 12 52      
Menkveld et al. 37            
   ROC curve analysis Fertile vs. subfertile 4     1.64 8
   Adjusted Fertile vs. subfertile 3     2.09 3
   Tenth (upper) percentile Fertile population 2     1.82 5
Guzick et al. 39 Fertile vs. subfertile > 12 9–12 < 9    
Haugen et al. 40            
   Tenth percentile Fertile population 4        
   Fifth percentile   3     1.72  
Fifth WHO manual 1            
   Fifth percentile Recent fathers 4        

Abbreviations: IVF, in vitro fertilization; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; TZI, teratozoospermia index; AI, acrosome index.

1

See text for more detailed descriptions of populations investigated.

2

Based on the positive and negative predictive values (see Gunalp et al. 38).