Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 9;8(8):e71299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071299

Table 5. Estimates from the home range model from the Sogn & Fjordane and Møre & Romsdal, with the best AIC fit predicting tick abundance within home ranges of resident animals, and winter and summer home range of migratory red deer.

Parameter Estimate S.E. z p
Sogn & Fjordane
Intercept −4e-3 0.33 −0.0 0.990
HR (resident vs. summer) 1.4 0.40 3.5 <0.001
HR (winter vs. summer) 1.3 0.17 7.8 <0.001
Year 2010 vs. 2009 −0.3 0.15 −2.2 0.031
Year 2011 vs. 2009 −0.6 0.16 −3.6 <0.001
Year 2012 vs. 2009 0.07 0.16 −0.5 0.630
HR (resident vs. summer): Year 2010 vs. 2009 0.3 0.19 1.6 0.100
HR (resident vs. summer): Year 2011 vs. 2009 4e-3 0.20 −0.0 0.980
HR (resident vs. summer): Year 2012 vs. 2009 −0.2 0.20 −1.0 0.300
HR (winter vs. summer): Year 2010 vs. 2009 0.5 0.21 2.3 0.020
HR (winter vs. summer): Year 2011 vs. 2009 1.1 0.22 5.0 <0.001
HR (winter vs. summer): Year 2012 vs. 2009 0.02 0.21 −0.1 0.910
Møre & Romsdal
Intercept −0.9 0.36 −2.6 0.009
HR (resident vs. summer) 2.9 0.52 5.6 <0.001
HR (winter vs. summer) 3.2 0.48 6.6 <0.001
Year 2012 vs. 2011 0.4 0.17 2.6 0.011
HR (resident vs summer):Year −0.5 0.23 −2.3 0.022
HR (winter vs summer):Year −0.9 0.21 −4.4 <0.001

Note that all variables are factors. Baselines are “summer” home range of migratory animals and year 2009 in Sogn & Fjordane and year 2011 in Møre & Romsdal. Individual ID of each red deer was fitted as a random term. HR = home range type. All ticks stages are pooled in these analyses.