Skip to main content
. 2013 May 24;34(21):1862–1879. doi: 10.1002/jcc.23328

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Results for Test set 1: How TRs deform MH α-helices, MH1 case. We compared 321 pMH1 complexes (blue) against 52 TR/pMH1 complexes (red). The medians are depicted as solid lines the interquartile ranges are depicted as dashed lines and the IPR are depicted as dotted lines. (A, B) Average curvatureInline graphic (nm−1) and average torsionInline graphic (nm−1) of the helix G-ALPHA1 at 34 (j) positions obtained as moving average of the local parameters over a turn (see Methods). (C, D) Average curvatureInline graphic (nm−1) and average torsionInline graphic (nm−1) of the helix G-ALPHA2 at 40 (j) positions, obtained as moving average of the local parameters over a turn (see Methods). (E, F) Average distribution parameterInline graphic (nm) and average conical curvatureInline graphic (–) of the ruled surface at 36 (k) positions on the striction curveInline graphic, obtained as moving average of the local parameters over an average turn (see Methods). The zoomed figures of the average conical curvatureInline graphic are depicted in Supporting Information Figure S5 and the arc tangent representation in Supporting Information Figure S6A. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com.]