Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Med Inform. 2013 Apr 30;82(7):565–579. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.03.007

Table II.

Sample size and study design for included studies

AUTHOR SAMPLE SIZE STUDY DESIGN
Kawarada et al. (1998)[35] n=2 (1 older adult) ECG in bathtub
n=2 (1 older adult) weight in lavatory
n=5 (4 older adults) ECG in bed
Technology Trial
Dario et al. (1999)[36] n=13 (older adults) microwave task
n=35 (not older adults) entire system
n=16 (not older adults) interface
Technology Trial, Descriptive Study
Glascock & Kutzik (2000)[37] n=1 (older adult) Technology Trial
Kawarada et al. (2000)[38] n=2 (1 older adult) ECG in bathtub
n=2 (1 older adult) weight in lavatory
n=5 (4 older adults) ECG in bed
n=6 (older adults) continuous monitoring
Technology Trial
Sixsmith (2000)[39] n=22 (older adults) + n=20 (family members) One-Group Pretest-Posttest
Ogawa et al. (2002)[40] n=2 (older adults) Technology Trial
Ohta et al. (2002)[41] n=8 (older adults) Technology Trial, Descriptive Study
Chan et al. (2005)[42] n=4 (older adults) Technology Trial
Kelly (2005)[43] n=1700 (older adults) Historical Controlled Trial
Alwan et al. (2006)[44] n=25 (older adults) + n=26 (family members) One-Group Pretest-Posttest
Fujimura et al. (2007)[45] n=8 (older adults) + n=7 (family members) Descriptive Study
Glascock & Kutzik 2007)[46] n=2 (older adults) case studies (out of three facilities with n=29, n=6, n=20) Descriptive Study
Tamura et al. (2007)[47] n=18 (11 older adults) Technology Trial
Tomita et al. (2007)[48] n=78 (older adults) (intervention=34, control=44) Randomized Controlled Trial
Brownsell et al. (2008)[49] n=52 (older adults) (intervention=24, control=28) Non-Equivalent Control Group Pretest-Posttest
Demiris et al. (2008)[50] n=9 (older adults) One-Group Posttest Repeated Measures
Diermaier et al. (2008)[51] n=2 (older adults) Technology Trial
Rahal et al. (2008)[52] n=14 (6 older adults) Technology Trial
Rantz et al. (2008)[53] n=2 (older adults) case studies (out of total n=34) Descriptive Study
Mahoney et al. (2009)[54] n=13 (older adults) + n=4 (family members) + 9 (staff) focus groups
n=10 (older adults) + n=10 (family members) + 9 (staff) pilot
Technology Trial, Descriptive Study, One-Group Pretest-Posttest
Noury et al. (2009)[55] n=12 (older adults) Technology Trial, Descriptive Study
Otjacques et al. (2009)[56] n=40 (older adults) interviews
n=19 (older adults) technology trial
Descriptive Study, Technology Trial
Rantz et al. (2009)[57] n=2 (older adults) case studies (out of total n=39) Descriptive Study
Skubic et al. (2009)[58] n=34 (older adults) Descriptive Study
Junnila et al. (2010)[59] n=2 (older adults) Technology Trial
Kim et al. (2010)[60] n=110 (older adults) surveys out of 365 issued
n=31 (older adults) interviews
Descriptive Study
Riche et al. (2010)[61] n=14 (older adults) interviews
n=2 (older adults) technology trial
Descriptive Study, Technology Trial
Etchemendy et al. (2011)[62] n=17 (15 older adults) One-Group Pretest-Posttest Repeated Measures
Kaye et al. (2011)[63] n=233 (older adults) Longitudinal Community Cohort Study
Lee et al. (2011)[64] n=2 (older adults) Descriptive Study
van Hoof et al. (2011)[65] n=18 (older adults) baseline
n=12 (older adults) exit
One-Group Pretest-Posttest