Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Psychosom Res. 2013 Jul 6;75(2):160–166. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.06.006

Table 2.

Fit indices of Latent Class Growth Analyses for daily diary PRO scores

LCGA Model LL AIC BIC Entropy VLMR (df = 3)
Anger
 1-Class −8339.75 16685.50 16697.30 n/a n/a
 2-Class −8267.44 16546.88 16570.47 0.64 144.64*
 3-Class −8224.78 16502.94 16502.94 0.83 85.33**
 4-Class −8216.10 16456.20 16503.38 0.79 17.35ns
Fatigue
 1-Class −8441.77 16889.54 16901.33 n/a n/a
 2-Class −8368.92 16749.84 16773.44 0.89 145.69*
 3-Class −8304.95 16627.90 16663.29 0.89 127.94*
 4-Class −8299.35 16622.70 16669.89 0.86 11.20ns
Depression
 1-Class −7658.53 15323.07 15334.87 n/a n/a
 2-Class −7578.45 15168.91 15192.50 0.79 160.16**
 3-Class −7527.97 15073.94 15109.33 0.86 100.97*
 4-Class −7521.73 15067.47 15114.65 0.87 12.47ns
Pain intensity
 1-Class −3792.73 7591.45 7603.25 n/a n/a
 2-Class −3575.62 7163.25 7186.84 0.92 434.21*
 3-Class −3461.69 6941.38 6976.77 0.90 227.86**
 4-Class −3431.33 6886.66 6933.85 0.86 60.72ns

Note: LCGA = Latent Class Growth Analysis; LL = log likelihood; AIC = Akaike Information Criterion; BIC = Bayesian Information Criterion; VLMR = Vuong-Lo-Mendell-Rubin likelihood ratio test for K-1 (H0) versus K classes; ns = not significant.

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01.