Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 12.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Neurosci. 2006 Oct;120(5):995–1004. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.120.5.995

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Subjects’ keypad responses to the conditioned inhibition test trials (AB) in (A) subjects aware of the BX− contingency (n = 34) and (B) subjects unaware of the BX− contingency (n = 16). The stimulus was rated as “+” when the subject believed that stimulus was paired with the airblast, “−” when the subject believed that stimulus was not paired with the airblast, or “0” when the subject did not know. *p < .05 compared with “+” response in aware subjects.