Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 14;19(30):4958–4965. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i30.4958

Table 3.

Treatment effect on the health-related quality of life assessed with Short-Form 36

SF-36 score Group
P value
Group A (n = 20) Group B (n = 20)
Physical functioning
Baseline 42.01 ± 13.47 32.83 ± 17.06 0.211
End of treatment 37.28 ± 12.76 38.42 ± 7.83 0.753
Role -physical
Baseline 31.51 ± 14.9 29.45 ± 15.51 0.670
End of treatment 37.88 ± 10.16 39.02 ± 12.49 0.768
Role-emotional
Baseline 32.01 ± 12.12 38.39 ± 12.68 0.112
End of treatment 36.99 ± 12.62 30.14 ± 16.95 0.182
Social functioning
Baseline 37.95 ± 14.06 33.82 ± 13.90 0.356
End of treatment 36.41 ± 13.03 30.07 ± 12.83 0.151
Body pain
Baseline 34.94 ± 14.39 30.13 ± 12.09 0.260
End of treatment 52.37 ± 17.00 41.32 ± 12.34 0.031
General health perceptions
Baseline 38.63 ± 11.66 31.82 ± 12.94 0.088
End of treatment 47.95 ± 18.58 31.84 ± 16.84 0.010
Mental health
Baseline 38.82 ± 14.72 39.20 ± 10.67 0.927
End of treatment 44.69 ± 10.79 38.88 ± 10.50 0.111
Energy/vitality
Baseline 38.08 ± 12.50 34.39 ± 12.64 0.360
End of treatment 42.95 ± 15.32 35.14 ± 10.87 0.084

All results are expressed as mean ± SD. Group A received amitriptyline and rabeprazole and group B received double dose of rabeprazole. P values are for the comparison of amitriptyline and rabeprazole vs double dose of rabeprazole at baseline and end of the treatment. Patients who received amitriptyline and rabeprazole treatment had a significantly greater improvement in the domains of body pain and general health perception than those who received a double dose of rabeprazole treatment (P = 0.031 and P = 0.01, respectively). The majority of the other domains of the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) did not reach statistical significance.