Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Biol. 2013 Jan 24;425(7):1225–1240. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.01.020

Table 3.

Comparison of experiment and simulations for longitudinal and lateral filament contacts (errors represent standard deviations)

Residue ID Cryo-EM results (change in distance upon cofilin binding) Equilibrium Distance (Å) Bare filament Equilibrium Distance (Å) Cofilactin Exp vs. MD
Longitudinal Contact
1. D-loop vs. C-term 41vs.374 Increase 13.09±1.5 22.02±4.22 Agree
61 vs. 374 Increase 23.29±1.24 25.68±2.12 Agree
45 vs. 370 Decrease 14.85±2.09 18.65±2.87 No
2. D-loopvs. SD1 45 vs. 169 Increase 9.74±1.74 13.93±4.24 Agree
61 vs. 169 Increase 12.78±1.4 16.70±2.57 Agree
3. D-loop vs. SD3 62 vs. 288 Increase 7.52±1.13 13.38±2.37 Agree
4. SD4 vs. SD3 205 vs. 286 Unchanged 9.29±0.53 12.69±2.2 No
241 vs. 322 Unchanged 11.03±1.76 12.73±1.93 Agree
Lateral Contact
1. H-plug vs. C-term 265 vs. 374 Increase 20.13±1.15 23.38±2.15 Agree