Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 12.
Published in final edited form as: Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Jan;88(1):155–163. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181fc30f3

Table 1.

Model Parameters.5, 11, 13-21

Parameter Reference # Value
Glaucoma Incidence Rates Females Males
 Age 40–49 5 0.0028 0.0035
 Age 50–59 5 0.0030 0.0048
 Age 60–69 5 0.0066 0.0112
 Age 70+ 5 0.0099 0.0114

Glaucoma Progression
 Annual probability of any field losses among people with glaucoma 11 0.149
 Hazard ratio for progression if intra ocular pressure greater than 21 11 1.67
 Hazard ratio for progression if field loss in both eyes 11 1.92
 Hazard ratio for progression if field loss the same eye 11 1.46
 Hazard ratio for progression if age over 68 11 1.42
 dBs lost given any field loss occurs; min, mode, max 11, Assumption 0.2, 0.8, 3.0

Treatment Contraindications
 Asthma prevalence, males 13 0.077
 Asthma prevalence, females 13 0.101
 Reaction to Prostaglandin analogues 14 0.1
 Reaction to Alpha-2 agonists 15 0.3

Treatment efficacy and duration of efficacy
 Treatment effect: relative risk of progression 11 0.60
 Treatment effect: relative risk for distribution of field loss 11 0.826
 Annual failure rate of betablockers 16 0.15
 Annual failure rate of prostaglandin 16 0.17
 Annual failure rate of alpha-2 agonists 17, Assumption 0.4
 Annual failure rate of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors 16 0.2
 Annual failure rate of laser trabeculoplasty 18 0.066
 Annual failure rate of trabeculotomy 18 0.052

Sensitivity and specificity of examinations
 Sensitivity of opthalmoscopy, <8 dBs lost 19 0.81
 Specificity of opthalmoscopy, <8 dBs lost 19 0.90
 Sensitivity of Automated Threshold Perimetry, <8 dBs lost 20 0.93
 Specificity of ATP, <8 dBs lost 20 0.88
 Sensitivity of opthalmoscopy, >8 dBs lost Assumption 1.00
 Sensitivity of ATP, >8 dBs lost 21 0.97