Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan;2(1):3–9. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.01.07

Table 1. Study characteristics.

Author (Reference) Year Patients (N) Age (yrs) F/U (yrs) F/U (pt-yrs) Preop. AI (>2+) (%) Marfan (%) Bicuspid AV (%)
Aicher (4) 2010 640 56 4.8 3,072 NR NR 32
Lansac (6) 2010 144 54.4 2.2 317 NR 13 22.9
Lansac (7) 2006 83 49.3 1.4 116 32.9 20.5 4.8
Boodhwani (8) 2009 264 54 3.9 1,030 74.6 NR 34.1
DePaulis (9) 2010 278 56 4.3 1,195 48.9 15.1 11.1
Settapani (10) 2009 60 60 2.4 144 64 5 15
Urbanski (11) 2010 106 61 1.4 148 60 NR NR
Doss (12) 2010 66 41.2 5.1 337 0 NR 100
Badiu (13) 2010 102 47 2 204 93.3 20.6 10.8
Cameron (14) 2009 85 33 15 1,275 NR NR NR
Svensson (15) 2010 129 NR 3 387 28.4 47.3 NR
David (16) 2010 289 48 7.3 2,110 51.2 34 8.3
Izumoto (17) 2006 40 61 3.6 144 NR NR NR
Tanaka (18) 2011 60 33 4.6 276 23.3 90 NR
Oka (19) 2011 101 49.7 5 505 70.3 23.8 11.9
Kallenbach (20) 2005 284 53 3.4 966 50.8 19 6
Minakata (21) 2004 160 55 4.2 672 60.3 NR 33.8

Preop. AI, preoperative aortic valve insufficiency; F/U, follow up; N, number; NR, not reported; yrs, years; pt-yrs, patient-years; AV, aortic valve