Skip to main content
. 2013 May;2(3):303–315. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.01.05

Table 3. Advantages and limitations of each cerebral protection strategy [reprinted with permission from Stein et al. (17)].

Technique Advantage Limitation Comment
DHCA Safe for short periods of circulatory arrest
Avoids cross-clamping an already diseased aorta
Questions of safety for long periods of circulatory arrest; increased incidence of permanent neurologic injury with >45 mins of circulatory arrest; conflicting data on transient effects with shorter (approximately 25 mins) ischemia Generally used in more
straightforward cases
ACP Permits longer periods of circulatory arrest than with straight DHCA Requires the handling of sclerotic vessels; may result in the release of emboli Technique most often used.
Controversies regarding ideal site of cannulation for optimal perfusion
RCP Flushes cerebral vasculature of toxic metabolic products and microemboli Perfusion may be limited to the brain’s surface Becoming less popular