Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Linguist Phon. 2013 Jul 2;27(9):661–680. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2013.789928

Table 1.

Individual Participant Characteristics and Averages by Condition.

Condition Participant1 Age2 Sex TEGI3 EGS % TEGI4 3S Spont.5 3S PPVT6 SS PPVT7 %ile GFTA8 SS GFTA9 %ile MLU- Words10
Sparse Sparse 3 4;0 M 23 25 45 90 25 110 71 3.70
Sparse 4 4;7 M 15 30 37 108 70 95 33 3.66
Sparse 5 4;4 M 12 0 25 99 47 100 43 3.97

Mean 4;3 NA 17 20 36 NA NA NA NA 3.78
Median NA NA NA NA NA 99 47 100 43 NA

Dense Dense 3 4;1 F 26 53 25 94 34 86 21 1.84
Dense 4 5;9 M 16 12 23 103 58 74 9 3.88
Dense 5 4;2 F 19 11 15 84 14 84 17 3.28

Mean 4;7 NA 20 29 21 NA NA NA NA 3.0
Median NA NA NA NA NA 94 34 84 17 NA

Notes.

1

Subject pseudonyms correspond to child’s assigned treatment condition (sparse or dense) and number of baseline sessions completed (3, 4 or 5 sessions).

2

Chronological age in years; months.

3

Elicited Grammar Composite of the Test of Early Grammatical Impairment: Scores represent average % correct for third person singular, regular/irregular past tense, Copula BE and Auxiliary BE and DO.

4

TEGI third person singular probe: Score represents % correct for third person singular.

5

% correct third person singular during a spontaneous language sample.

6

Standard scores on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test 4th Edition (M = 100; SD = 15).

7

Percentile ranks on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test 4th Edition.

8

Standard scores on the Goldman Fristoe Test of Articulation 2nd Edition (M = 100; SD = 15).

9

Percentile ranks on the Goldman Fristoe Test of Articulation 2nd Edition.

10

MLU in words calculated from a 30-minute spontaneous language sample.