Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 13.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Sin. 2012 Apr 1;22(2):703–728. doi: 10.5705/ss.2010.093

Table 7.

Analysis of the Mashi data with the IPW and AIPW methods.

IPW AIPW Rel. Efficiency IPW vs AIPW
Coef Est. S.E. p-value Coef Est. S.E. p-value
τ = 0.005
Intercept 52.0 19.2 0.007 37.0 22.1 0.09 1.32
Treatment 38.0 61.7 0.54 102.0 68.8 0.14 1.24
τ = 0.01
Intercept 64.0 31.4 0.04 64.0 33.6 0.06 1.15
Treatment 66.0 108.9 0.54 120.0 59.1 0.04 0.29
τ = 0.02
Intercept 94.0 113.0 0.41 113.0 95.9 0.24 0.72
Treatment 182.0 107.3 0.09 163.0 87.5 0.06 0.66
τ = 0.03
Intercept 207.0 164.5 0.21 214.0 147.0 0.15 0.80
Treatment 91.0 186.7 0.63 84.0 132.1 0.52 0.50