Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 18;14(7):15017–15028. doi: 10.3390/ijms140715017

Table 1.

Effects of the static magnetic fields (SMF) and fluoride on antioxidative defense parameters in fibroblasts.

SOD [U/106 cells] GPx [U/106 cells] CAT [nM/min/106 cells] GST [nM/min/106 cells]
Control 0.78 ± 0.024 627.6 ± 2.07 10.36 ± 0.86 68.73 ± 3.07
SMF0 + F 0.56 ± 0.018 a 503.6 ± 24.05 a 8.66 ± 0.89 70.15 ± 2.67
SMF1 + F 0.56 ± 0.024 a 541.7 ± 2.77 a,b 8.72 ± 0.87 74.78 ± 1.06 a,b
SMF2 + F 0.58 ± 0.013 a 615.4 ± 26.12 b 10.06 ± 0.59 76.54 ± 1.69 a,b
SMF3 + F 0.63 ± 0.010 a,b 695.2 ± 4.28 a,b 10.69 ± 0.85 b 83.16 ± 1.12 a,b

Results are presented as mean ± S.D. (n = 5);

a

p < 0.05 vs. Control;

b

p < 0.05 vs. SMF0 + F; Control, control culture without magnet (flux density 0T) and without fluoride ions; SMF0 + F, control culture with fluoride ions (0.12 mM) and without magnet (flux density 0 T); SMF1 + F, culture with fluoride ions (0.12 mM) and with magnet (flux density 0.4 T); SMF2 + F, culture with fluoride ions (0.12 mM) and with magnet (flux density 0.6 T); SMF3 + F, culture with fluoride ions (0.12 mM) and with magnet (flux density 0.7 T).