Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 2;97(2):428–436. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.045997

TABLE 2.

Adjusted associations (95% CIs) between urban residence, educational attainment, and BMI within 5 wealth groups1

Time 1(n = 232,150) Time 2(n = 465,423)
Poorest wealth group
 Urban residence 0.14 (−0.01, 0.29) 0.12 (0.02, 0.23)
 Educational attainment
  Completed primary 0.19 (0.09, 0.3) 0.23 (0.16, 0.08)
  Secondary or higher 0.51 (0.16, 0.86) 0.08 (−0.09, 0.37)
Second wealth group
 Urban residence 0.16 (0.04, 0.28) 0.1 (0.02, 0.17)
 Educational attainment
  Completed primary 0.17 (0.08, 0.26) 0.19 (0.12, −0.1)
  Secondary or higher 0.16 (−0.07, 0.4) −0.1 (−0.22, 0.36)
Third wealth group
 Urban residence 0.3 (0.2, 0.39) 0.23 (0.17, 0.3)
 Educational attainment
  Completed primary 0.17 (0.08, 0.26) 0.32 (0.26, −0.15)
  Secondary or higher 0.09 (−0.08, 0.25) −0.15 (−0.25, 0.53)
Fourth wealth group
 Urban residence 0.34 (0.27, 0.42) 0.35 (0.29, 0.4)
 Educational attainment
  Completed primary 0.3 (0.22, 0.39) 0.31 (0.24, 0.01)
  Secondary or higher 0.06 (−0.07, 0.19) 0.01 (−0.08, 0.7)
Highest wealth group
 Urban residence 0.86 (0.77, 0.94) 0.74 (0.67, 0.81)
 Educational attainment
  Completed primary 0.72 (0.63, 0.82) 0.48 (0.4, 0.44)
  Secondary or higher 1 (0.89, 1.11) 0.44 (0.36, 1.02)
1

Associations were calculated by using multilevel linear models and were additionally adjusted for age (10-y groups; fixed effect), marital status (fixed effect), country (random effect), region within country (random effect), and primary sampling unit (random effect).

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure