Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin J Pain. 2014 Jan;30(1):10.1097/AJP.0b013e31828518e9. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31828518e9

Table 2.

Descriptive data for study measures

Adolescent
Report
n=102
Parent
Report
n=102
Measure M SD M SD Paired
t-value
(significance)
Pain Intensity (0–100mm VAS scale)
   Usual Pain 59.17 22.06 54.72 22.72 2.72 (0.008)
   Most Pain 85.02 18.3 80.78 20.48 2.40 (0.018)
   Least Pain 35.35 22.21 39.28 23.98 −1.85 (0.068)

Pain catastrophizing (PCS-C and PCS-P) 30.89 10.33 26.52 11.43 3.94 (<0.001)

Biopsychosocial perspective of pain
   BIOPSYCH (range 0–20) 11.97 3.66 13.39 2.69 −2.92 (0.004)
   DAMAGE (range 0–10) 3.98 3.04 4.25 2.96 −0.74 (0.460)
   EMOTION (range 0–10) 5.95 2.68 7.65 2.10 −5.48 (<0.001)

Readiness to change
   Precontemplation (PSOCQ-A,PSOCQ-P) 3.63 0.84 3.02 0.67 6.75 (<0.001)
   Contemplation (PSOCQ-A, PSOCQ-P) 3.53 0.57 3.67 0.58 −2.09 (0.039)
   Action/Maintenance (PSOCQ-A) 3.35 0.67 - -
   Action (PSOCQ-P) - - 3.79 0.56
   Maintenance (PSOCQ-P) - - 3.32 0.70

Note. BIOPSYCH = “Biopsychosocial perspective of pain” total score; DAMAGE = “Pain always means a part of the body is damaged”; EMOTION = ”Pain is affected by feelings and emotions”