Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 13;8(8):e71442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071442

Table 2. Characteristics of 680 health facilities, and circumstances of microscopy and malaria RDT use.

Health post Health centre Reference health centre Hospital Laboratory and supervising Total
Number 80 429 90 70 11 680
Microscopy
No reply 2.5% 3.3% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 2.5%
No 56.3% 45.0% 10.0% 2.9% 9.1% 36.8%
Yes 41.3% 51.7% 88.9% 97.1% 90.9% 60.7%
 Always 13.8% 22.6% 58.9% 61.4% 72.7% 31.2%
 RDT stock out 13.8% 11.0% 3.3% 2.9% 9.1% 9.4%
 Malaria suspicion with negative RDT 7.5% 8.6% 7.8% 2.9% 0.0% 7.6%
 Request from clinician 3.8% 4.0% 12.2% 24.3% 0.0% 7.1%
 Other or not specifieda 2.5% 5.6% 6.7% 5.7% 9.1% 5.4%
RDT use
No reply 0.0% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.3%
No 2.5% 14.0% 18.9% 15.7% 36.4% 13.8%
Yes 97.5% 83.9% 81.1% 84.3% 63.6% 84.9%
 Always 78.8% 52.9% 42.2% 27.1% 27.3% 51.5%
 Request from clinician 5.0% 4.2% 11.1% 35.7% 9.1% 8.5%
 Giemsa stock out or no microscope 3.8% 6.5% 7.8% 4.3% 9.1% 6.2%
 If RDT availableb 5.0% 6.5% 5.6% 4.3% 9.1% 6.0%
 RDT in ward, microscopy in lab 2.5% 4.7% 4.4% 5.7% 0.0% 4.4%
 Malaria suspicion with negative TBF 0.0% 3.3% 5.6% 4.3% 0.0% 3.2%
 Other or not specified 2.5% 5.8% 4.4% 2.9% 9.1% 5.0%
Training
No reply 0.0% 4.0% 3.3% 2.9% 0.0% 3.2%
No 70.0% 39.2% 50.0% 38.6% 72.7% 44.7%
Yes 30.0% 56.9% 46.7% 58.6% 27.3% 52.1%
Consultations/month, median (IQR)c 25 (18–33) 130 (56–308) 201 (86–338) 304 (157–711) 40 (26–50) 30 (8–80)
RDT/month, median (IQR)c 11 (5–22) 40 (13–90) 40 (13–106) 50 (6–114) 97 (30–112) 35 (11–88)

TBF Thick blood film; RDT rapid diagnostic test.

a

besides facilities not specifying the circumstances of use, includes the options: (i) RDT in ward, microscopy in laboratory; (ii) patient follow-up; (iii) person performing the RDT absent; (iv) other.

b

under the option “other”, 41/47 health facilities indicated themselves to perform RDTs if they were available.

c

in April 2012.