Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Subst Use Misuse. 2013 Mar 25;48(6):457–469. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2013.778283

Table 4.

Phase V Campus Study, Predictive Validity using Crude Logistic Regression Analyses (N = 520 students)

Variables Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)
Intrapersonal Stream
Ultimate Underlying Causes
Inattentiona 2.08 (1.63, 2.67)**
Hyperactivitya 2.42 (1.80, 3.24)**
Sensation-Seekinga 2.07 (1.62, 2.65)**
Gender
  Female 1.00
  Male 1.18 (0.79, 1.79)
Race/Ethnicity
  White 1.00
  Asian or Pacific Islander 0.22 (0.07, 0.72)*
  Other 0.92 (0.50, 1.69)
Age 1.00 (0.95, 1.06)
Year in School
 1st year 1.00
  2nd year 2.29 (0.87, 6.03)
  3rd year 3.37 (1.33, 8.55)**
  4th year 4.07 (1.63, 10.17)**
  5th year or postbac 4.65 (1.75, 12.36)**
International Student Status
  Domestic 1.00
  International 0.80 (0.26, 2.47)
Enrollment Credits 0.94 (0.85, 1.04)
Distal Predisposing Influences
Psychological Distressb 1.45 (1.13, 1.86)**
Academic Concernb 1.73 (1.34, 2.24)**
Grades
  A 1.00
  B 3.29 (1.85, 5.85)**
  C 6.21 (2.91, 13.27)**
ADHD Diagnosis
  Never Diagnosed 1.00
  Ever Diagnosed 2.92 (1.61, 5.31)**
Proximal Immediate Predictors
Avoidance Self-Efficacyc 0.24 (0.18, 0.31)**
Social Situation/Context
Ultimate Underlying Causes
Residence
  Off-Campus Housing 1.00
  Campus Housing 0.21 (0.10, 0.48)**
Distal Predisposing Influences
Greek Life
  Non-member 1.00
  Member 1.42 (0.84, 2.40)
Varsity Sports
  Non-member 1.00
  Member 1.43 (0.83, 2.48)
Relationship Status
  Not in a relationship 1.00
  In a relationship and NOT living together 0.96 (0.61, 1.50)
  In a relationship and living together 0.75 (0.39, 1.42)
Strength of Relationshipsd
  Friends 1.09 (0.84, 1.43)
  Family 0.93 (0.72, 1.19)
  Faculty/ Staff 0.81 (0.66, 1.01)
Perceptions of IUPS by Socializing Agentse
  Friends 4.02 (2.88, 5.63)**
  Family 3.16 (2.34, 4.26)**
  Faculty/ Staff 1.05 (0.82, 1.35)
Endorsement of IUPS by Socializing Agentsf
  Friends 4.06 (3.08, 5.35)**
  Family 3.72 (2.30, 6.02)**
  Faculty/ Staff 1.93 (1.21, 3.08)**
Proximal Immediate Predictors
Perception of Prevalence Rates
  Friends IUPS 1.06 (1.04, 1.07)**
  Campus IUPS 1.03 (1.02, 1.04)**
Sociocultural Environment
Ultimate Underlying Causes
Financial-Related Stressb 1.31 (1.11, 1.54)**
Participation in Religious Activitiesb 0.66 (0.55, 0.79)**
Exposure to Prescription Drug Media on Televisiona 1.03 (0.85, 1.23)
Exposure to Prescription Drug Print Mediaa 0.87 (0.72, 1.04)
Campus Culture – Perc. of Academic Demand #1a 1.39 (1.07, 1.80)*
Campus Culture – Perc. of Academic Demand #2a 1.10 (0.90, 1.35)
Campus Culture – Perc. of Sub. Use During Collegea 1.46 (1.16, 1.83)**
Campus Culture – Perc. of HC Providers Rx writinga 1.17 (0.95, 1.44)
Distal Predisposing Influences
Interactions with Social Institutionsa 1.28 (1.04, 1.58)*
Interactions with Soc. Inst. Influencing Valuesa 0.73 (0.52, 1.03)
Informationa 1.10 (0.91, 1.32)
Information Influencing Knowledgea 1.18 (0.98, 1.42)
IUPS Expectanciesg
  Positive Expectancies 3.53 (2.68, 4.65)**
  Negative Expectancies 0.74 (0.60, 0.92)**
Proximal Immediate Predictors
Knowledge about Prescription Stimulantsa 1.34 (1.08, 1.67)**
Costs/Benefits of IUPSa 5.91 (3.72, 9.38)**
Immediate Precursors
  IUPS Intentionsh 8.17 (5.66, 11.80)**
Related Behaviors
  Substance Useh 3.62 (2.82, 4.66)**
*

p < 0.05

**

p < 0.01

a

Response options for items and composite range from 1 = Strongly Disagree to 5 = Strongly Agree

b

Response options for items and composite range from 1 = None of the time to 5 = All of the time

c

Response options for items and composite range from 1 = Not at all confident to 5 = Completely confident

d

Response options for items range from 1 = Very Weak to 5 = Very strong

e

Response options for items range from 1 = Very Negatively to 5 = Very Positively

f

Response options range from 1 = None to 5 = All

g

Response options range from 1 = Very Unlikely to 4 = Very Likely

h

Response options range from 1 = Never to 7 = 40 or more times