Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Biol. 2013 Jun 7;425(17):3121–3136. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.05.028

Table 3.

Comparing standard and CC1/2-based resolution cutoffs for pH=7.0 + Cys dataa.

Rmeas-based I/σ-based CC1/2-based
Data collection
Resolution (Å)b 1.58-1.50 1.48-1.40 1.32-1.25
CC1/2 0.92 0.71 0.15
Average I/σ 3.9 1.9 0.6
Rmeasc 61% 119% 365%
R/Rfree @1.5 Å (%)d 14.5/17.6 14.7/17.6 15.3/17.6 (14.5/17.6)e
Waters built 237 253 251 (283)
a

The pH 7.0 Cys-bound models were refined using the same automatic phenix.refine strategy which was used as the first step in refinement (see methods) against data truncated at 1.50 Å (based on Rmeas ~60%), 1.40 Å (based on I/σ ~2), or 1.25 Å (based on CC1/2 criteria)35.

b

The resolution range for the data used in refinement was 42 Å to the high resolution limit

c

the multiplicity-weighted merging R-factor55

d

Rcryst and Rfree of the indicated model calculated at 1.50 Å resolution

e

Numbers in parentheses are for the final refined model